Laserfiche WebLink
~ 2.5 1897 Hydrological Data <br />~ Hydro-E Int.'s c~oNation of the 1997 h <br />ngineerirp ydr+obgical data for Trapper Mine is subm8ted as Section <br />2.5, addressing: <br />a. Groundwater .........................................................................Sections 2.0-3.6 <br />(1) Static water level graphs ...............................................Appendix A <br />(2) SaNnBy graphs .............................................................Appendoc B <br />(3) Piezorrretric surface maps for the major aquifers...........Maps 2.1-2.3 <br />(4) Water quality ................................................................Appendix B <br />b. Surtace water ........................................................................Sections 4.0-5.3 <br />(1) Water qual9y Mures and tables ....................................Appendbc C <br />(2) Flow c~arta ...................................................................App~dbc C <br />(3) Flow ws TSS vs tirrre .................................................... C <br />(4) Conductivity ~ flan vs time .....................................:....Appendix C <br />Inched with the 1997 Hydrobgy Report is a tan 1o keep basic data and aquifer <br />information ava9at>>e to the reader. This ~ tit ba ueed sa tl~s rice and a "bootu~lrerk" as <br />the section is reviewed. <br />2.6 Tends <br />Hydro-Engineering's Section 8.0 discusses the observed facts on the h~ systems of Trapp <br />Mine. In general, ground water levels and surface water flows were him a due to ~e <br />~' higher than normal prec~p8ation for the year. Trapper corrt~ues to have Nltte ei~ct ~ ttre local hydro- <br />~, logic reg~rre. <br />Y.7 8poi18pring 8aanplMg (1997) <br />Trapper conducted a spoil spring urventory across the rn~e s8e during 1997. Data from ttris ~ventorR ie <br />presented in the 1997 Annual Hydroioyy Report Appendbc 8 Table 8-2. Sprirp and Seep bcatians are <br />shown on the Annual Hydrologic Report MeR 2 (SMeets 1, 2, and 3y of this Severs wane <br />sampled for fua su8e an~yses in 1997 for ~e of establistdng some baseline iradon. to <br />1998 and beyond, only those springs wRh lbws exceeding 5 gpm waN be sampled in acxrordar~r wi9r the <br />approved monitoring program. <br />2.8 WET Testing Results <br />In 1997, six NPDES outfags had Acute WET tests pertoRned as requ~+ed by NPDES Pem~t CO-0032115. <br />NPDES saes 001, 002, 011, 013, 015, and 017. In aN but one case the discharges showed no acute <br />to~daty to the test species. A WET test fa~rre did occur for C. dubia ~ outfs~ 011 (East Pyeatt drainage) <br />during the fourth quarter of 1997. Accelerated testing compietecl during the first quarter of 1998 !ltowec~, <br />the documented toxicity was not persistent. Summaries for the tests conducted during 1997 are <br />in Append'oc C of Section 2.5. In accordance withh our NPDES permit, ony those draa~ages that receive <br />pit dewatering or spoil spring contributions are required to underno WET test~g. <br />KCKJkdc 3198 <br />\ / M:V1PNrUALRPIOAA(3D7RP7~7REPT'2.DOC <br />