My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64845
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/2/1992
Doc Name
ADEQUACY RESPONSE FN M-92-069
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Lorraine Stepenske <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />September 24, 1992 <br />Page 6 <br />As a matter of information we have enclosed copies of our <br />substitute supply plan and the well permit application which were <br />submitted to the Division of Water Resources. In our most recent <br />application on Tucson Resource in Adams County, it was a <br />requirement of the permit to show proof we had submitted these <br />applications. We believe that would be an appropriate condition on <br />this application. <br />The recharge ponds or trenches are one of several options which the <br />operator can use in order to replace water to adjacent well owners. <br />In. the past we have never been required to provide final <br />construction documents for these ponds or trenches. They will be <br />constructed on the operators property between the mine and the well <br />and as close to the well as possible. We understand these are <br />disturbances on the site and would need to be reclaimed if the <br />operator forfeited the bond. At the most, these facilities would <br />be 5,000 square feet in size each and we think there could be a <br />need for them both at the east and west end. It is fair to ask for <br />monies to cover this reclamation and we propose an amount of <br />$1,000.00 each to reclaim these facilities for a total of <br />$2,000.00. <br />We are providing a copy of this clarification letter on your <br />adequacy review to the Weld County Clerk. Your adequacy questions <br />have required no changes or additions to the application. Please <br />call me if you have any additional questions. <br />Cordially, <br />TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC. <br />Gary J. Tuttle <br />GJT/cr <br />Encs. <br />cc: File #92-106 <br />Carl Hill <br />Weld County Clerk and Recorder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.