HYDRO27875 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,, Solids Locations • SW SUMP: solids were collected at the bottom of the (dry) Leve16 pad stormwater sump • ORE: solids were taken from the ore body geologic formation • ALLUVIUM: solids were taken from the alluvium material from the Leve16 pad area • WASTE ROCK: solids were taken from the waste rock pile at the Leve16 pad. Surface water samples were analyzed for major (and some minor) anions and cations that aze typically used to `type' water and `trace' flow pathways. These include total recoverable and dissolved calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, silica, sodium, bicazbonate, cazbonate, chloride, hydroxide, sulfate and total alkalinity (total CaC03). The results were compiled using tabulated data and graphical formats in order to be able to compaze findings between sample locations. The results were also compared to the solids analysis in order to determine if solids solutes may be a contributor to the measured water quality within the samples. Solids samples were analyzed for `leachate' anion and cation content using synthetic precipitation leaching procedures (SPLP). SPLP is an extraction process that pulls soluble constituents from the solid matrix with the use of a rigorous acid digestion. The resulting leachate or elutriate was then analyzed for the same suite of anions and cations listed above for the surface water. The results provide an indication of whether or not the solid could act as a source of any anion or cation measured in the surface water samples. Measurements of water quality indicators of pH, temperature, conductivity and total dissolved solids were collected `real time' at the time of sample collection. These measures were collected with the use of a hand held field meter pre-calibrated using anticipated standards ranging about the expected concentrations for the field setting. All samples were collected in accordance with standazd water and solids collection procedures. All samples were collected directly into appropriate sample containers with standard protocols for the control of cross contamination being adhered to. Samples were immediately placed on ice in coolers with appropriate chains of custody and shipped at day's end for next day arrival to the laboratory (ACZ Laboratories, Steamboat, CO). Resulting laboratory documentation indicated that samples were delivered in good order with no discernable chain of custody or holding time error. Results The analytical results for the water samples collected are provided in Table 1, while the results of the SPLP leachate analysis of various solids aze provided in Table 2. The surface water concentration results were within the low `parts per million' range which allows for the use of various water typing graphical methods. However, since the concentrations were relatively low, trends aze more discernable with the use of the raw results in addition to the graphical interpretations. Therefore, for the purpose of this report, the point by point analytical results were used in combination with the graphical methods to identify trends and possible pathway linkages. The graphical methods applied to the analytical results were all developed using Rockware Aquachem softwaze. Measured concentrations in ppm or ppb were converted to meq (milliequivalents) or mass percentage where appropriate for the graphical method. Data were Page 9 of 16