My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27875
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:14 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:34:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978091UG
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
9/4/2007
Doc Name
SWMP control response
From
Gault Group Inc
To
Water Quality Control Division
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
present and constantly managing the same approximate rate of underground flow (~1 gpm) <br />year-round. If the toe seeps were to be hydrologically linked to the sump, it stands to reason that <br />the seeps would also flow year-round. However, the seeps are seasonal. They have only been <br />recently located and studied. The seeps aze currently dry, yet the underground sump is not. The <br />flows within the seeps have been observed to be directly correlated to the flow conditions within <br />Deadman Gulch. <br />Further study of the Deadman Gulch water chemistry indicated that the low-pH conditions <br />persist over the length of the drainage. This maybe due to several factors including; the natural <br />neutralization processes either aze saturated or never existed, andlor the hydrogeology may lend <br />(add) to the acidity. It is possible that the neutralizing potential of the Gulch is never tapped <br />since there is little retention time between the water and channel itself. In addition, any acidity <br />leant by pyrite oxidation from the waste rock pile would be unstable because it is balanced <br />rapidly with oxygen and water. Therefore, it appeazs that the hydrologeologic setting of <br />Deadman gulch is lending to the continuous, and relatively stable nature of the low pH. <br />In addition, comparison of the Deadman Gulch setting to other settings in close proximity (e.g. <br />the Slumgullion slide, and the hydrothermally altered azeas within the Uncompahgre Caldera that <br />occur adjacent to the Lake Fork of the Gunnison) indicate that the area commonly has naturally <br />acidic conditions (Neubert, J.T., 2000). For instance, the Slumgullion Slide contains fine- <br />grained, clay-rich minerals with a compositional analysis indicating sulfates as the most <br />abundant soluble salts, thereby lending to a natural acidic chazacter (Chleborad, A.F. et al., <br />1996). Colorado Geologic Survey studies of the Slide yielded naturally acidic conditions with <br />manganese, iron and aluminum exceedences of state standards in all samples collected within the <br />slide azea. Similazly, the CGS evaluated natural, hydrothermally altered settings that occur <br />adjacent to the Lake Fork of the Gunnison and create slightly lower pHs within the Lake Fork <br />(6.98 at the confluence) (Neubert, J.T., 2000). <br />From a toxicological standpoint the prevalent low pH within Deadman Gulch is not concerning. <br />Low pH by itself is not necessarily toxic. Many organisms are adapted to pH extremes which is <br />best exemplified by the fact that there is abundant vegetation directly within the Deadman Gulch <br />channel. The secondary effects of low pH, such as toxic metals mobilization, are the true <br />concern from a toxicological standpoint. Review of the Deadman Gulch data indicates that <br />metals precipitate or plate onto solid surfaces or suspended materials over the course of the <br />drainage length. The ultimate load to the Lake Fork is considerably less than the initial `dose' <br />from the waste rock toe seeps. Sample analysis from within the Lake Fork did not yield any <br />detected concentrations of metals above criteria limits protective of aquatic life. <br />Recommendations <br />The results of this study indicate that the Deadman Gulch base flows (background flows) are <br />chemically and hydrologically linked to the waste rock toe seeps observed at the base of the <br />Golden Wonder Leve16 pad (and cited by CDPHE as point source discharges). The resulting <br />water quality contains acidic pHs that have caused concern to others. Review of the Deadman <br />Gulch site setting indicates that this intermittent tributary is not affecting water quality within the <br />receiving drainage of the Lake Fork of the Gunnison and contains chemical chazacteristics <br />typical to the azea. GGI recommends that Deadman Gulch base flows be routed away from the <br />waste rock pile, however GGI wntends that there aze no negative impact and that the Gulch <br />should beheld to suitable expectations and standards. <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.