My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64787
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:41 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:33:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 20 ATTACHMENT C NUCLA MINE AREA RECLAIMED DRAINAGE CHANNEL DESIGN
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Introduction <br />The reclaimed channel design for the Nucla Mine (Area 1) was based on CMLRD regulations <br />pertaining to diversions and conveyance of overland flow and ephemeral streams draining a <br />watershed less than one square mile. The location of the reclaimed channel is shown on <br />Exhibit 20-3 and depicted as profile K-K'. Please refer to Exhibit 20-5 for the profile <br />of this channel. <br />The postmining drainage channel is not in the same location as the premining channel.. <br />This situation occurs as a result of taking advantage of the existing pit and ramp <br />locations. The premining channel slope was 3.3 percent. The postmining channel slope <br />will be 1.1 percent. <br />Design <br />The computer program SEDCAD Version 3.0 was used in the design of the postmining stream <br />channel. Please refer to the end of this attachment for a complete printout of input and <br />output. The design was based on the runoff resulting from the 10-year, 24-hour <br />precipitation event. The peak flow was evaluated just upstream of existing Culvert C-3 <br />(under Road A-A). The channel downstream from this culvert has already been constructed. <br />The channel design also considered the possibility that some day the surrounding area <br />could be irrigated. The channel could potentially have to handle irrigation flow plus the <br />runoff from the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event. During the 1989 irrigation season, <br />the Second Park Irrigation Ditch, which is just upstream of the reclaimed channel, had an <br />average flow of 8 mgd or approximately 12 cf s. Therefore, 12 cfs was added to the channel <br />design as a baseflow condition. It should be noted that this is a very conservative <br />approach due to the fact that the entire flow would have to be diverted to achieve this <br />condition. The water rights situation would probably preclude this from ever happening. <br />The following represents the main input parameters for the SEDCAD computer hydrology <br />model. <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.