Laserfiche WebLink
• TO: BOCC <br />FROl~i: Planning Commission (staff Steven Weatbay) <br />RE: Recommendation for Sear Coal to reconfigure the permit <br />boundary, obtain a release of liability and extend the <br />operations duration <br />DATE: December 16, 1994 <br />At their regular meeting on December 16, 1994, Mark Schumacher <br />moved, Les White seconded, and the Planning Commission unanamiously <br />approved the following recommendation. <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION: <br />The Bear Coal Company applied to reactivate the permit <br />boundary to the south and east of its Bear No. 3 mine, which will <br />increase the life of the mine. This action will extend the mining <br />operation five years beyond its present permitted life, which means <br />the mine will operate for approximately seven more years. Bear <br />mine proposes to reduce the subsidence monitoring performed at Bear <br />No. 3, as well as obtain a release of liability for some of the <br />permit area associated with Bear No. 1 and 2. The Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) indicated that Bear Coal <br />has applied (phone conversation on 12-8-94 between Gunnison County <br />Planner Steven Westbay and Tony Waldron (CDMG)) to reduce the <br />permitted mining area and obtain a liability release associated <br />• with this action and expand operations into coal seam B in an area <br />where coal seam C was previously mined. Tony Waldron (CDMG) noted <br />that the action should not impact surface water, and mining will <br />occur in an area where "renewable resources" will not be impacted. <br />Waldron noted this seam B mining area may underlie an ancient <br />landslide. If the State determines that mass movement may be a <br />potential problem they will require monitoring to determine if <br />slope movement is reactivated. This permit by Bear Coal will not <br />change the present operations in terms of number of employees, <br />surface operations, additional facilities, or additional traffic. <br />A technical revision of the Bear permit proposes to <br />discontinue subsidence monitoring in two different circumstances. <br />Bear Coal proposes to stop monitoring in areas where no mining <br />activity has occurred within the past two years. They also propose <br />to cease subsidence monitoring in areas not considered to have <br />renewable resources. The CDMG definition of "renewable resource <br />lands" is as follows: "Renewable resource lands means aquifers and <br />areas for the recharge of aquifers, areas for agricultural or <br />silvicultural production of food and fiber, and pasturelands." <br />Under the Colorado State Mined Coal Lands regulations, Bear Coal is <br />not responsible for monitoring subsidence in areas that are not <br />considered "Renewable resource lands." Bear Coal will continue <br />monitoring in those areas with existing slope stability monitoring. <br />• Bear Coal is reactivating mining within the NE1/4, Section 20 <br />1 <br />