My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64638
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:34 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:29:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
GEOMORPHIC & ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF COLO YAMPA COAL CO ECKMAN PARK MINE FINAL REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
level of confidence. Frequency distributions of the existing and <br />• approved slopes (Fig. 2. 1) are also similar. A second sampling <br />procedure was used to distinguish between hillslopes and valley side- <br />slopes. Hillslopes on existing and approved topography are not <br />significantly different at the 95% confidence level. Frequency <br />distributions are also similar (Fig. 2.2). <br />Existing valley side-slope gradients are less than approved <br />gradients and this reduction in gradient should improve stability of the <br />existing topography. Valley side slopes are significantly different at <br />the 95% confidence level. Frequency distribution of valley side slopes <br />are shown in Figure 2.3. <br />2.2.2. Hypsometric Curves <br />• Hypsometric analysis is a means of determining the distribution of <br />mass within a watershed (strahler, 1952). A planimeter was used to <br />measure the area of the watershed above a given contour on a topographic <br />map. Elevation of each contour measured was plotted against area above <br />the contour for both existing and approved conditions. <br />Areas 9/10, 51, 7, and 31 are contiguous and, therefore, they were <br />treated as a single mine area (Fig. 2.4). Area 41 is separated from the <br />other mine areas by an undisturbed drainage valley and it has been <br />analyzed separately (Fig. 2.5). <br />The curve pairs in Figures 2.4 and 2.5 are similar indicating that <br />spoil has been replaced so that the area above each contour, either <br />existing or approved, is very similar. This strongly suggests that <br />approximate original contour has been achieved throughout the mine area. <br />r 1 <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.