My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64583
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64583
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:31 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:27:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/14/1999
Doc Name
COMMENTS OR THE ADEQUACY OF THE APPLICATION
From
GENERAL CHEMICALS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lJ <br /> <br />According to this article, it would appear that the American Soda process is likely to have an <br />effect on dawsonite. As will be shown below, American Soda does not have the mineral rights <br />to dawsonite and therefore dawsonite (aluminum / alumina's) must be considered in process <br />solution and water monitoring program's analyses. The presence of dawsonite related <br />compounds can also indicate the occurrence of destructive distillation of oil shale. <br />AMERICAN SODA CORRESPONDENCE TO THE BLM <br />Below are excerpts from a March 13, 1998 letter from Kurt Nielson of American Soda to Mike <br />Pool of the BLM: <br />"The task of attempting to develop the sodium minerels is seriously impeded by the unusual <br />terms of these sodium leases." <br />"The presently projected in situ mining operation may be limited and unnecessarily <br />hampered by the uncertainties that remain because of the lease terms as they were issued. It <br />must be remembered that the existing leases are total sodium leases that encompass all <br />leasehold sodium minerals including dawsonite. However, the lease language impedes <br />recovery of that soditun compound." <br />"It makes far more sense to recognize the fact that in this area, oil shale's only possible <br />value is as a production aid to produce alumina from dawsonite. Tn essence, oil shale is a <br />soditan related product, not an independent product and should be included in the <br />sodium lease." <br />....AND THE BLM RESPONSE TO AMERICAN SODA <br />Below are excerpts from a Apri128, 1998 letter from Mike Pool of the BLM to Kurt Nielson of <br />American Soda: <br />"Thank you for your March 13, 1998, letter which raised several issues on development of <br />your sodium leases in the Piceaoce Basin. Your letter identified three main issues: (1) e <br />request to modify lease stipulations to allow higher temperatures for solution mining, (2) a <br />lease exchange proposal, and (3) a request to modify or remove stipulations that would <br />allow the extraction of the sodium mineral dawsonite." <br />"Due to the solubility characteristics of dawsonite and its coexistence with oil shale, <br />your third request will necessarily involve the destructive distillation of oil shale. The <br />retorting process will create the leasable mineral shale oil or kerogen. The only authority <br />the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has to sanction the production of this commodity, <br />even as a by-product, is through a lease issued under the authority of the Mineral Leasing <br />Act of 1920. Your existing soditmt leases cannot be modified to allow the production <br />of oil shale...... For these reasons, any new lease issued to authorize the mining and <br />processing of oil shale and, in cogjunction with that operation, the recovery of <br />dawsonite intermingled with and a wnstituent part of the oil shale deposit, will, of <br />necessity be an oil shale lease or a multimineral (oil shale and sodium) lease." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.