Laserfiche WebLink
~ = h m~l ~ ~ <br />_~ e <br />90 East Halsep RuaJ <br />Parsippany, iv.l 07054 <br />Tel: 973•i 150900 <br />May 12, 1999 <br />Mr. Allen Sorenson <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Comments on Adeqaacy of the Reclamation Application, Yankee Gulch Project, File <br />No. M-99-002 (American Soda) <br />Dear Mr. Sorenson: <br />We are in the process of reviewing the information provided by American Soda in <br />support of their reclamation permit in order to provide comments no later than May 18th. <br />Instead of waiting until all of our comments are assembled and sending you one packet we have <br />assimilated some immediate concerns, based principally on apparent omissions, and will <br />forward additional comments in an organized format as the comments become available. The <br />immediate concerns are as follows: <br />I. Missing Information <br />The last information provided to us was that American Soda was classified as a <br />designated mining operation (DMO) pursuant to C.R.S. 34-32-112.5. We agree that <br />American Soda should be treated as a DMO. As a DMO, American Soda must provide an <br />environmental protection plan (EPP). As of this writing we have not seen any summary <br />reference document detailing each of the nineteen required elements of an EPP as listed in Rule <br />6.4.20. From what we have been provided in the original permit application and subsequent <br />application submittals, the nineteen required elements have not been addressed in sufficiently <br />organized fashion for us or for the DMG to provide a reliable evaluation. If the DMG believes <br />that existing documents correspond to each of the nineteen required elements, we would be <br />satisfied, for the purposes of being able to complete our comments, if you could contact us by <br />telephone to draw our attention to the manner in which Rule 6.4.2.0 has been met. <br />As a separate concern, Mr. Posey's hydrogeochemical review of April 17, 1999, wisely <br />indicated that American Soda should provide supporting evidence that temperature controlled <br />reprecipitation of dissolved solids can be considered an effective means to control leaks of <br />process water to the upper aquifer, or other USDW's. We have not yet seen such evidence, or <br />any related documentation or reference which support American Soda's assumption that such <br />solids will form. As with the previous item, we would be satisfied, for purposes of being able <br />to complete our comments, if you could direct our attention to materials which you believe <br />constitute such evidence. <br />