My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64532
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:26:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999058
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
06/25/1999 11:15 9706413061 GUNNISON COUNTY PAGE 05 <br />• • , <br />14. The Forest Service has elected not to maintain the trail because of alternative <br />routes in the area although from the testimony these routes would require doubling back <br />perhaps 2 to 3 miles to reach the quarry. <br />15. The prior owner testified to having erected a fence during a 4-year period <br />when dynamite was in use (1959 -1963). <br />16. There presently are 3 posts early on the trail beyond the current gate which <br />effectively preludes any motorized vehicle from traveling beyond that point. It is the <br />Court's impression from the deposition of Mr, Bush that those posts have been there for <br />a considerable time and are a safety check to prevent vehicular traffic given the <br />sloughing. <br />CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br />1. The elements for granting a preliminary injunction are recited in Rath v <br />MacFarlane, 648 P.2d 648 (Colo. 1982}, as follows: ~ <br />(1) a reasonable probability of success on the merits; (2) a danger of real, <br />immediate, and irreparable injury which may be prevented by Injunctive <br />relief; (3) that there Is no plain, speedy, end adequate remedy at law; <br />(4) that the granting of a preliminary injunction will not disServe the <br />public interest; (5) that the balance of equities favors the inJunction; <br />and (6) that the injunction will preserve the status quo pending a trial <br />on the merits. <br />2. Reasonable orobability of success. Under the Gourt's analysis, the County <br />has clearly established a reasonable probability of success on the merits pursuant to <br />C.R.S. § 43-2-201(1)(c). That statute reads in relevant part as follows: <br />43-2-201. Public highways. (1) The following are declared to be public <br />highways ... (c) All roads over private lands that have been <br />used adversely without interruption or objection on the part of <br />the owners of such lands for twenty consecutive years. <br />a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.