Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Western Colorado/Rio Grande Rift -Source 3 <br />The Western Colorado Source contains the Rio Grande rift, the <br />western Rocky Mountains and the Colorado Plateau. The majority of <br />seismic activity in the state of Colorado is located within this source <br />zone. Much of the seismicity is associated with the Rio Grande rift <br />system in southern and south-central Colorado. A diffuse pattern of <br />seismic activity is present in the Colorado Plateau with no appazent <br />regional causative structures. <br />The Rio Grande Rift system contains late Quaternary normal faults <br />and it is possible that the extensional stresses that chazacterize this <br />source could lead to reactivation of preexisting faults within other <br />parts of the source. We treat major seismogenic faults in the Rio <br />Grande rift as line sources in SEISRISK III as discussed in the preced- <br />ing sections. To account for other possible unrecognized or reacti- <br />vated faults, we assign a maximum magnitude of 7.0 to this source <br />zone. Recurrence relations aze illustrated on Figure 5. <br />The;Great Plains -Sources 4 & 5 <br />The Great Plains physiographic province lies east of the Rocky <br />Mountains and south and east of the Denver Basin (Figure 1). Risk <br />Engineering (1994) divided the province into northern and southern <br />source zones at approximately 38.5° north latitude. According to Risk <br />Engineering (1994), the boundary between the northern and southern <br />Great Plains sources is somewhat azbitrary. In general, Source 4 to the <br />south represents an area of higher relief and exposure of bedrock at the <br />surface. Only diffuse and minor earthquake activity is present in the <br />Source 4 and is entirely absent in Source 5 to the north. The maximum <br />earthquake magnitudes assigned to Sources 4 and 5 aze 6.0. Recur- <br />rence relations are illustrated on Figures 6 and 7, respectively. <br />7.2 ATTENUATION RELATION <br />SEISRISK III requires an attenuation table as input to the program. <br />For this study, we used the attenuation relationship of Joyner and <br />Boore (1981) formulated as: <br />32 <br />