My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64516
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:26:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001035
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/8/2001
Doc Name
PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS TROUT CREEK DAM PROJECT NEAR BUENA VISTA CHAFFEE CNTY COLO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Arkansas Valley graben, although markedly narrower, is similar <br />geologically to its San Luis Valley counterpart and can be traced <br />northward to Tennessee Pass neaz Leadville. North of Tennessee Pass, <br />the characteristic axial graben is absent, but north-striking, range- <br />bounding, high-angle normal and reverse faults continue along the <br />same structural trend. Grose (1974) states that this faulting may be <br />considered an integral part of the Rio Grande Rift system. Rifling <br />began in mid-Miocene time (25+ mybp) and continued through the <br />Pleistocene (1.9 mybp) and at least locally into the Holocene (<10,000 <br />YbP)• <br />USBR (1980, 1990), in seismotectonic hazard evaluations for Twin <br />Lakes and Sugarloaf dams, divided the Upper Arkansas Valley graben <br />into north and south grabens separated by a horst (uplifted fault block) <br />of crystalline basement rock near the town of Granite about 17 miles <br />(28 km) north of Buena Vista. Cleaz evidence of late Pleistocene to <br />Holocene movement on the Sawatch fault is present in the south <br />graben. Evidence for comparable young movement in the north <br />graben, however, is absent or equivocal. The increasing age of fault- <br />ing and generally decreasing late Quaternary scarp heights from south <br />to north coupled with apparent structural segmentation of the graben <br />near Granite indicate that the north and south grabens are distinct and <br />sepazate structural elements within this part of the Rio Grande rifr. No <br />late Quaternary to Holocene faulting has been specifically identified in <br />the north graben. <br />Tweto (1979) distinguished the "Rio Grande rift" from the "Rio <br />Grande rift system." The use of "Rio Grande rift" is restricted to the <br />more-or-less continuous axial graben. The "Rio Grande rift system," <br />on the other hand, includes not only the axial rift, but also Neogene <br />block faults many miles distant from the main rift structures. These <br />coextensive faults, at least in part, aze believed to represent reactiva- <br />tion of older structures dating back to Precambrian time (>600 mybp). <br />The "rift system" as defined by Tweto (1979) encompasses most of <br />central Colorado and includes a number of faults either in or bounding <br />the Colorado Front Range. Rift system faults, however, are believed <br />to exhibit significantly lower displacement rates than their axial <br />counterparts. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.