Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III tNDUM <br />INTER ggg <br />TO: ERICA CROSBY" <br />FROM: ALLEN SORENSON ~~ <br />SUBJECT: STABILITY OF HIGH PRESSURE GAS PIPELINE, TELLIER GRAVEL PIT, <br />JOHNSON EXCAVATION, INC., FILE NO. M-98-058 <br />DATE: 09/15/98 <br />The proposed mine plan for the Tellier Gravel Pit includes mining to within 200 feet of a high- <br />pressure gas pipeline. Rule G.4.19 of the Constmcdon Materials Rules and Regulations of the Mined <br />Land Reclamation Boazd specifies that when muting will occur within 200 feet of any significant, <br />valuable, or permanent man-made structure, an apphcant may either: <br />• Provide a notarized agreement between the applicant and the person(s) having an interest in the <br />structure, that the applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the stmcure. <br />• \X/ttere such an agreement can not be reached, the applicant shall provide an appropriate <br />engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by activities <br />occurring at the mirtirtg operation. <br />In the case of the Tellier Pit, the applicant has provided an engineering evaluation to demonstrate <br />that their mine plan will be fully protective of the pipeline. Presumably the applicant has attempted <br />to reach an agreement vvith the operator of the pipeline to allow mining within 200 feet, and was <br />unsuccessful If not, the applicant should contact the pipeline operator and attempt to reach an <br />agreement, as this is the preferred mechanism for compliance under the regulations. However, given <br />that the application included an engineering demonstration of stability within the pipeline easement, <br />rather than an agreement with the pipeline operator, the Division's review of the application will <br />proceed under the assumption that such an agreement will not be forthcoming. <br />The elements of the mine plan directed toward protection of the pipeline include a five foot mining <br />setback from the pipeline easement boundaries, as well as a commitment to maintain a maximum 1:1 <br />cut slope at the mined face. A slope stability evaluation was prepazed for the applicant by Northwest <br />Colorado Consultants, and was included in the permit application. The Division is in concurrence <br />with the conclusions in the report that the cut slopes will be resistant to failure with adequate safety <br />factors as long as the report's recommendations aze adhered to during mining of the pit. However, <br />the stability analysis provided applies only to relatively lazge-scale earth movements, such as deep- <br />seated circulaz failure. In addition, the report indicates that there is the potential for surficial <br />sloughing on the ]:] cut slopes that aze proposed. The Division is concerned that smaller scales <br />strains, such as may be caused by relief of pre-existing stresses in the bank when the gravel is <br />excavated, may be suffiuent to adversely affect the pipeline. <br />In order to address the Division's concerns related to protection of the pipeline, the applicant must <br />address the following issues: <br />