Laserfiche WebLink
FOR AND ON THE RECORD: THE COURT TAKES JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THtS AFFIDAVIT/NOTICE <br />IN FACT <br />COMES NOW the Libellant by Restricted Appearance and not Generally, within the admiralty, by Commercial <br />Affidavit 1 FAC responding to Libellee(s) motion to enter judgment and entry of new evidence pursuant to <br />F.R.C.P. #60 (b)(2). <br />Libellant notices the Court, this NOTICE TO STRIKE [he Libellee(s) Motion to Enter Judgment, and to take <br />IUDICIAL NOTICE WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY, OF EVIDENCE IN FACT, OF THE FILING OF <br />CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF NON RESPONSE AND ESTOPPEL <br />On October 12, 2004, Carolyn Nelson, Notary Acceptor mailed by Registered Mail, 8 RB 619 449 883 US to <br />Respondent(s), Libellee(s) a CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF NON RESPONSE, and Respondent(s), <br />Libellee(s) agreed by their silence to the following: Respondent(s)/Libellee(s) received th CERTIFICATE AND <br />NOTICE OF NON RESPONSE on October l3, 2004 as indicated on the Retttm Receipt. <br />°ESTOPEL BY ACOUIESCIENCE: In the event Respondent admits the statements and claims by <br />TACIT PROCURATION, all issues are deemed settled RES ND[CATA, STARE DECISIS and <br />COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. Respondent may not arguq controvert, or otherwise protest the fmality of the <br />administrative fmdings in any subsequent process, whether administrative or judicial:' <br />(See Eahibit °B: A copy of the "CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE OF NON RESPONSE with attached return <br />receipt ) <br />L. <br />a) The Libellee(s) move to enter Judgment when they are at default in Libellant's Administrative Remedy <br />"Within the Admiralty" where all matters have been resolved in Libellant's favor. This is the second trespass <br />against Libellant. <br />b) The judge in this case, FREDRICK D. ROGERS, is one of the Respondents and by sitting to hear We <br />motion of Respondents, is committing Barbarity against Libellant. <br />MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE <br />FRCP Rule'? <br />"IN THIS CASE. THE DEFAULTED PARTY 1S) HAVE NO MERITORIOUS DEFENSE". <br />(PAGE 8-10) "LOOSE PLEADING; is a crv [o punish the client for choosing a Lawver who <br />chanced to be a Door pleader. The real importance o[ the pleading rules is that they make pleadings, <br />is and of themselves, relatively unimportant <br />Moores Federal Practice, Rule H 12 (PAGE 12 -28) <br />2 <br />