My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64403
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:24:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/2/2007
Doc Name
Notice of Appeal- Rule 4(a), C.A. R.
From
Colorado Court of Appeals
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• adequacy of monitoring program to ensure the protection of surface and <br />groundwater resources. <br />(G) Has the Applicant demonstrated compliance with applicable Colorado water laws <br />and regulations governing injury ro existing water rights? (Rule 3.1.6(1)) <br />(H) Has the Applicant stated how it will comply with applicable groundwater <br />performance standazds? (Rule 3.1.7.) <br />(I) Has the Applicant adequately described the game and non-game resources, <br />including threatened and endangered species, on and in the vicinity of the <br />application area, and provided a description of the impacts to such resources <br />during mining and reclamation, and appropriate mitigation measures? (Rule 6.4.8 <br />-Exhibit H.) <br />(]) Has the Applicant provided an adequate description of the reclamation plan to <br />demonstrate it can achieve the post-mining ]and use of "wildlife hahitat" with <br />respect to revegetation`? (Rules 3.1.10 and 6.4.5 -Reclamation Plan.) <br />(K) Has the Applicant provided a plan describing the methods to be employed for <br />weed control? (Rule 3,1.10(6).} <br />(L) Has the Applicant adequately described vegetation resources with respect to [he <br />relationship of present vegetation types to soil types? An objector questioned <br />whether wetland areas were identified and/or delineated. (Rule 6.4.10 -Exhibit <br />J.) <br />(M) Has the Applicant provided an adequate estimate of the reclamation cost required <br />to complete the reclamation plan and achieve the desired post-mining land use of <br />wildlife habitat with respect to the revegetation costs? (Rule 6.4.12 -Exhibit L.) <br />MMRIt Board Order, M-2n04-067 <br />2675 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.