My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27744
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27744
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:47:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:23:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/11/1993
Doc Name
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR MANAGEMENT OF SALT IN MINE WATER DISCHARGES
Permit Index Doc Type
OTHER SURFACE WATER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be as little as $2.25 or as much as $10.94 added on to each ton of <br />coal mined. As I do not enforce the Colorado River salinity <br />standard, I have no idea as to what to do at this juncture. The <br />facts are: the mine is way over it's CDPES limit in salt loading, <br />and the costs to bring the operation into compliance may lead to a <br />mine closure. What to do? Is there a partial solution besides <br />these costly alternatives, perhaps just one discharge point could <br />install a Reverse osmosis device, phasing in the other two over <br />time. Since the costs per ton of mined coal decrease as the <br />quantity of coal mined increases, then additional RO devices may be <br />stipulated as the mine increases its contractual obligations. <br />I don't know. Steve, what do you think? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.