My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64166
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:09 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:18:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
BASELINE WILDLIFE INVENTORY
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX H
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> distribution of sage grouse in the Plilliams Fork Mountains <br /> <br />• does not include the study sit=_ (Colorado Division of Wi1d- <br />~. life, 1976). One sage grouse was observed on the site, <br /> indicating a small population may exist in the Hayden Oulch <br />-~' area. However, lack of optimal habitat precludes the study <br /> site from being good sage grouse country (see Figure 2. 1). <br />- The study site's dense mountain shrub vegetation <br /> provides excellent blue grouse habitat. A covey of eleven <br /> blue grouse was flushed several times during the faunal <br />_ survey in October. Blue grouse exhibit an altitudinal <br /> <br />' migration, moving to higher elevations in the winter where <br />~ they feed almost exclusively on coniferous needles and <br /> buds (Rogers, 1968). Blue grouse in the region of the <br /> study site probably move south of the F}illiams Fork River <br /> into the coniferous fore_ts on the Flat Tops heavy srcwfall <br /> winters. Colorado Division of f~ildlife estimate3 that the <br />• overall density of blue grouse in the area of the study <br /> site was 2.5 grouse per square mile in 1975, a relati*rely <br /> poor year for grouse. Since grouse populations can fiuc*_uate <br /> from year to year by a factor as high as 105, a density of 25 <br /> blue grouse per square mile could be expected in the. study <br />~. area during good blue grouse years (Hector, 1976). <br /> The rolling hills within the Yampa River drainage, <br /> especially the area north of Hayden, support the largest <br /> population of sharp-tailed grouse in the state (see Rogers, <br />• 1969, Baily and Neidenach, 1965). Although some shrub <br />i~;= cover is needed by sharptails for nesting, roosting and <br /> escape, dense shrub cover limits their distribution. Optimal <br />_, habitat requires either a numi:er of small openings (1 to 10 <br /> acres each) or a single large opening (50 to 100 acres) in <br />~~ the shrub cover (Rogers, 1969), especially for use during <br /> the breeding season. Dense shrub vegetation in the ;Pilliams <br /> <br />, Fork Mountains restricts sharptails in the area of the study <br />~ site to openings resulting from fires (see Figure 2.3). <br />-- During spring, sharptails congregate on "dance grounds" <br /> where the males perform elaborate courtship displays in <br /> connection with breeding. The same dance ground is utilized <br /> by the local population each year. A sharptail dance ground <br /> }mown as the Hayden Divide dance ground, is located less than <br />~~ one mile northwest of the study across County Road 53. Rogers <br /> (1969) reports that the clearings, which occur along grassy <br /> swales and in dense shrub cover, were created by fire. Because <br />~• the range of an individual sharptail is between one and two <br />~ miles (Hart et. a1., f.950; Marshall and Jenson, 1937), irdi- <br />• viduals using the Havden~Divide dance ground may nest and forage <br /> on the study s}te. }Iowever, dense shrub cover over mast of the <br /> study site may limit sharptail use' to the more open area <br />1 <br />~~~ • -49- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.