My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE64130
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE64130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:10:07 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:17:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981042
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/17/1981
Section_Exhibit Name
APPLICATION (1981)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operations and reclamation on the hydrologic balance of <br />• underground water should be nil. Although coal seams may <br />carry some water, the amount should be relatively small if <br />other coal mining operations are a guide. Water wells in <br />Sections 22, 27, 33 and 34 should also be unaffected by <br />mining activities. This is because ground waters flowing <br />through the Menefee are diverted into the trough of the <br />perine peak syncline and contribute little to the ground <br />waters along the crest or the southeast limb of the Durango <br />anticline. It is also believed the impact of underground <br />mining operations upon vested water right holders should be <br />nil. <br />13. Surface Water Information. Three streams pass through <br />the areas held by applicant. The south flowing Animas, the <br />tributary Lightner Creek, and the La Plata River. The Animas <br />and Lightner Creek drain most of the area, and the La Plata <br />River drains the western portion of the area. <br />In addition, surface water flows intermittently down <br />Coal Gulch from snow and occasiona]. precipitation, as well as <br />occasional other surface water flowing across the affected <br />area as a result of snow runoff or precipitation. <br />During the process of excavations, applicant has en- <br />countered water emanating from abandoned underground mining <br />works in the area of the Green Pond noted on Map A-1. The <br />• water in the pond had a pH of about 6 in early spring of <br />1979, and as of October 1979, had a pH of 5-5.5. Some ferric <br />iron, perhaps colloidal, is present in the water principally <br />from its greenish color. In late 7978 when flow rate from <br />the workings was almost zero, the pH was about 7.5 and some <br />sulphur and iron salts were precipitated around the edges of <br />the pond. When the pond is allowed to fill to its planned <br />depth, oxidation of the underground rocks where the entries <br />are now exposed will decline as the workings become completely <br />submerged several hundred feet north of the old portal. In <br />its final state, the pH of the pond will expectedly be less <br />acidic and remain constant. <br />47ater captured in the Green Pond tends to have natural <br />purification by settling and aeration. To the extent water <br />overflows from the Green Pond, a second, smaller sedimenta- <br />tion pond has been dug south of the Green Pond to provide for <br />the additional settling of suspended solids and neutralization. <br />The Green Pond and the sedimentation pond are connected by a <br />culvert. <br />Water draining from the Coal Gulch flows in a south- <br />easterly direction toward the affected area, and will be <br />diverted around the disturbed area by means of a conduit. <br />Between the conduit and the disturbed area will be constructed <br />a berm or other barrier to prevent coal fines and other <br />drainage across the affected area from contaminating water in <br />- 8 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.