Laserfiche WebLink
As previously indicated, although the general purpose of the Class RI cultural resources survey <br />project was to identify the possible remains of art "Indian Burial Ground", none were found. However, it <br />was recommended that due consideration be given [o recording the throe potentially idcntifeed sites using <br />appropriate OAHP forms and procedures prior to the initiation of the pit construction (Carrillo 2004). <br />Vasco, tree., agreed to have the archaeological site recording and evaluation completed. <br />Site Recording <br />Prior to undertaking the site recording, a professional prehistoric archaeologist, Ms. Seyhan <br />Dwells, was included as part of the recording team for the purposes of evaluating and recording the <br />presumed prehistoric locales. Ms. Virginia Hochnadel, an associate of Ms. Dwehs, was retained to serve <br />as field technician to assist with the field recording and report preparation. <br />The recording of the sites was carried out as follows: <br />1) Upon arriving at each site, the previous flagged potential artifacts were examined, and an <br />initial and cazefiil walkover of each site location was conducted by the azchaeological team <br />to assess the potential artifacts and attempt to locate any additional artifacts, features, etc., <br />not observed during the site survey. Ail additional artifacts and feature located were to be <br />flagged. <br />2) Completion appropriate Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Colorado <br />Historical Society (OAHP/CHS) forms including Management, Prehistoric, Historical <br />itrchaeolagy, Linear and other additional forms (i.c. artifact inventory description forms) <br />for each site). The sites will be described using attributes including site size, distance to <br />water, geology, topography, geography, vegetation, mrd several additional variables. The <br />purpose of the site recording is to make a determination of eligibility regarding inclusion to <br />the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or State Register of Historic Places <br />(SRHP). <br />3) Completion of scaled field maps of each site showing the natural topographic landscape, <br />and all plotted features and/or artifacts. <br />4) Photographs and sketches would be taken of selective artifacts (i.e. projectile point, <br />cartridge, etc.). Additionally, each site would be photographed showing the site and its <br />relatiouslrip to the landscape. Diagnostic artifacts, if found, would be collected. <br />Cuarte(ejo HP Associates inc., maintains a curation agreement with the Louden-Henritzc <br />Museum, Trinidad State College, far curation of any artifacts collected from Las Animas <br />County, as a requirement of state archaeological permit. <br />Results of the Sitc Assessments and Recordine <br />The two prehistoric locales were assessed by Ms. Dwells. The assessment of 04. VTP.Ol served to <br />reveal that the presumed artifacts comprised of sandstone were not cultural, but rather were a result of <br />natural processes (Figure I ). The locale had previously been disturbed by limited grading operations. <br />Therefore, after careful consideration, it was decided that the material did not represent artifacts, and so no <br />further work was carried out. <br />At the location represented by 04.VTP.02, the site locale was situated slightly beyond the northern <br />Vasco T Pit property boundary. It was discovered at the initiation ofthe field survey, when due to a ' <br />missing survey flag at the property's southwest corner, the initial survey transact was inadvertently started <br />at the present northwest property corner believing it was the southwest property. Upon completion of the <br />-2- <br />