Laserfiche WebLink
• ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 33~ <br />~. ~~r~szr Hin r ~"R'' 1rn~na+3;~a, ~ s ~ +2T ~.s,^."'°r o- ,n ~.r ~ '..-.~.~#.~~~^ ~~~..~~n'm"ry' ~ <br />-~''~ ,.:~.~~~'4».tiis:4~~...`..k ae71..~....n.~.:.'st~~..] ..lia3& ~' .[.s`~.-v " ~n.~".r ~...{.3v~~i <br />Batch A distinct set of samples analyzed at a specific time <br />Found Value d the OC Type of interest <br />Umit Upper limit for RPD, in %. <br />Lower Lower Recovery Limft, in % (except for LCSS, mgMg) <br />LCL Laver Contrd Limd <br />MDL Melfxxl Detection Limit. Same as Minimum Reporting Limit. Allows for instrumerd and annual fluctuations. <br />PCN/SCN A number assigned to reagentslstandards to trace fo the manufacturefs certifcate of analysis <br />PQL Pradical Ouantttation Limit <br />DC Tme Value of the Contrd Sample or the amount added to the Spike <br />Rec Amount of the We value or spike added recovered, in % (except for LCSS, mg/Kg) <br />7doD Relative Pemen[ Difference, calculation used for DupBcate DC Types <br />Upper Upper Recovery Limit, in % (except for LCSS, rtgMg) <br />UCL Upper Corrtrd Limd <br />Sample Value of the Sample of interest <br /> ~'? ~'~' x ~v's"rs't' ~ ~-~',.'.'~-`}'_ (yr_.~s~'^. ,'d'r>~+#r.^y~QB'~.y.~l~" '*,~.g^'-i~")`w.° • '}. <br />u~ ,~,.!t ix Y ' <br />' <br />l <br />~ <br />~ <br />YY~ <br />~ S <br />`~ <br />~d' <br />- <br />5 <br />~ <br />r <br />'~ <br />'~ <br />p <br /> re.~si.:~.a3-^..].:.ru..E::~ <br />.II..iSia <br />.dt <br />] , v1:%NYSa ./ie <br />i6C~.Y _s <br />S.js.AZ <br />ulv <br />w <br />. <br />.t <br />ic~ <br />~ <br />t <br />..c „1: ~.N <br />x . <br />il~-a.. <br />s <br />u <br />SURR Surrogate LFM Laboratory Fortified Matrix <br />INTS Internal Standard LFMD Laboratory Fortifietl Matrix Duplicate <br />DUP Sample Duplicate LRB Labomtory Reaged Blank <br />LCSS Laboratory Control Sample - Shc MS/MSD Mafriz SpikeRvtatdx Spike Duplicate <br />LCSW Laboratory Control Semple-Water PBS Prep Blank-Shc <br />LFB Prep Blank -Water <br />Laboratory Fortified Blank - PBW <br /> <br /> <br />• . _ ~ L'~'` <br />y' <br />~ 1~~-e^` h~^^ A. y}t i #~~ >-~'~i t` x ~ V~q '~ "R A -rX F~ 'a.( F~ ~r"Ity'~S-+~*~~^-1-' ~ >i'.. `P,~,S.M <br />.._ t ~~~`~T i ~..+;~t.,sisi >t,3 -i'L ~~~~G ~.-.+~~.a~"f~.~.~''i+' `i ;.as ~.~''. t,.v.e,:.~xil.:~`! <br />• <br />Blanks Vedfies that there is no or minimal contartunation In the prep method procedure <br />contrd Samples Verifies the accuracy of the method, including the prep procedure. <br />Duplirates Verifies the predsiori of the instrument and/or method. <br />atrix iMerterences, if any. <br />SpkedFortified Matrix D <br />e <br />t <br />en <br />n <br />i <br />res sample m <br />^ <br />3 <br />~ <br />~4 x~y{ <br />~ <br />$ <br />~ <br />p <br />• <br />• -.t f <br />' <br />s9~~~M <br />Y~.d <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />' <br />~M~' <br />~ <br />u ~ <br />~ <br />''~ <br />~ <br />S <br />_ . <br />iu, <br />,~... <br />.a <br />f.+L <br />. <br />~3:.r`;ci. <br />i59a <br />>a'.~-C <br />.i~ <br />....+. <br />L <br />':3 <br />u <br />i <br />s <br />B Analyte deteded in daily blank <br />H Analysis exceeded melttod hdd time. <br />J Analyte concentration deteded at a value between MDL and PDL <br />R Pow spike recovery accepted because the dher spike in the set fell within the given limits. <br />T High Relative Portent Difference (RPD) accepted because sample coxentratioru am less than 10x the MDL. <br />U Analyte was arelyzed for but not deteded at the indicated MDL <br />V High blank data accepted because sample concentration is 10 times higher than blank concentmCwn <br />W Poor recovery for Silver quality control is accepted because Silver often predpttates with Chbrtde. <br />X Duality contreol sample is out of contrd. <br />Z Poor spike recovery is accepted because sample ooncentmtion is lour times greater then spike concedmtion. <br />P Analyte concentration differs from second tletedor by more man 40%. <br />E Analyte concentration is estimated due to result exceeding calibration range. <br />M Analyte concentration is estimated due to matrix interterences. <br />~ , ~ .. .... .. ~ ~. c -. - -. <br />(1) EPA~600/4-83-020. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1983. <br />(2) EPA 600/490/020. Mettxxl5 fa the Determination of Organic Compounds in Ddnkirg Water (q, July 1990. <br />(3) EPA 600IR-921129, Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water (II), July 1990. <br />(5) EPA SW-846. Test Mettxxls for Evaluating Sdid Waste, Third Edition with Update III, f)ecember, 1996. <br />(6) Standard Methods for the,~Examinatbn of Water and WaVSte~water, 19th ediUar, 7995. <br />f~?~.3f-nai k~;v-;~~~~`,.'_+'~~.:Y,'_~~:~~4k.r. TES > > '..'. i r'< :.~~ J ;2+;r : +n l ~ ~ -: <br />dpi. _~.-.....K^'la~G-~ ~ ~~ ~ x.Wr S'`:`~iM1.~:..-.~. ~a~ <br />(1) OC results calculated frorrr raw date Results may vary slightly tithe rounded values are used in the calculations. <br />(2) Organic analyses are reported on an "as received" basis. <br />REPIN03.11.00.0f <br />L39081: Page ll ofl4 <br />