My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63896
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63896
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:12:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 22 REVEGETATION PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
level at which a species may be used in a given year. Table 22-8, Shrub and Tree Planting Lists, lists <br />• the primary species and addition/substitute species to be used in planting areas. The species selected <br />represent those native species which have a better opportunity for establishment considering the more <br />xeric site conditions of the reclaimed areas. <br />Aspen has been retained on the list in an attempt to reestablish some aspen areas in appropriate sites, <br />if available. The native aspen stands in the mine area represent the limit of this species range and <br />occur only because of unique soil, substrate, and moisture regimes which are beneficial to aspen. <br />Mueggler 119881 and DeByle and Winokur 119851 have noted the relationship between the presence of <br />aspen and specific site conditions. Many or all of these site conditions are no longer present in <br />reclaimed sites aver spoil and thus the reestablishment of aspen on the mine site is difficult at best. <br />Aspen will be planted in select upland sites and will be included in the mesic drainage tree and shrub <br />sites. The upland aspen sites will receive normal topsoil replacement depths. Revised Exhibit 22-1, <br />Postmining Vegetation, shows the aspen upland sites and the mesic drainage sites. The two upland <br />aspen sites are located in surficial disturbance areas which should allow critical aspen substrate <br />characteristics to be maintained. In addition, aspen disturbance in the vicinity of these two sites will <br />be minimized to that necessary to complete topsoil stockpiling, access, and final grading. Since aspen <br />reestablish primary by suckering, adjacent undisturbed aspen clonal stands can increase the likelihood <br />• of aspen reinvasion in those areas of minimized surface disturbance. <br />As noted earlier under site preparation, planting areas will have competing vegetation eliminated or <br />reduced to the best extent possible. The planting areas (excepting the upland aspen sites) will receive <br />approximately 0.5 feet of topsoil and will be deep ripped to a depth of 1 .5 feet. The permanent seed <br />mix will not be seeded in these areas. Experience and observations of planted sites at the Seneca II <br />Mine indicate control of competing vegetation over the short term le.g., using mechanical tillage) may <br />only be partially beneficial since the suppressed herbaceous vegetation redevelops faster than the <br />seedlings can become adequately established to compete with herbaceous vegetation. The use of pre- <br />emergent herbicides or other herbicides to aid in longer term suppression of competing vegetation will <br />be a necessary component of this program. Herbicides are discussed under weed control. <br />• <br />21 Revised 2/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.