My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63711
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:09:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/27/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 21 Minesoil Reconstruction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
loam spoil. Schuman and others (1980) found that native grass production on reclaimed • <br />spoil in Wyoming equaled forage production on an undisturbed native area when the soil <br />thickness was 1.3 feet. In northwestern Colorado, Mcginnies and Nicholas, 1982, <br />demonstrated with field and greenhouse studies that vegetation stands, herbage yield, antl <br />root production ell increased linearly as soil depths increased from 0 to 1.5 feet. Barth <br />(1984) found that ,production of perennial grasses on bare spoil with no adverse <br />properties, was as great as when spoil was covered with soil of any thickness. <br />DePUit, 1984, points out that plant community composition and diversity for rangeland is <br />often reached at shallower soil depths than what is required for maximum production. 'This <br />phenomenon apparently exists at the Seneca Mine in northwestern Colorado where <br />Pfannenstiel and Wendt (1985) demonstrated that 0.5 feet of soil applied to Wadge spoil in <br />1976 has produced a native looking sagebrush grassland community with a shrub density of <br />1,450 stems/acre. Proper soil handling techniques used in combinat ion with suitable spoil <br />replacement and soil/spoil scarification, where needed [o reduce compaction, are more <br />effective in reestablishing minesoil productivity than 50 years of succession on poor <br />quality minesoils (Schafer et al-, 1979). ' <br /> <br />A mean soil replacement thickness of approximately 1.8 feet (1.0 foot minimum excluding <br />shrub islands where 0.5 feet of soil will be applied) over final graded spoil at Yoast <br />Mine and 1.1 feet (0.5 foot minimum) over final graded undisturbed substratum along Haul <br />Roads A and B and the facilities in Section 8 will be beneficial to establishing a good <br />seedbed and rooting medium. This conclusion is supported by the above referent etl <br />literature, premine soil survey (Tab 9), and vegetation inventories (Tab 10), as well as <br />on-site data from Peabody's Seneca II and 11-W Mines. The anticipated loamy soil texture <br />will likely have favorable infiltration and water holding characteristics. Also, the <br />spoil medium immediately below the soil will typically have desirable chemical and <br />physical characteristics for plant growth ineluding a loamy texture, low sodicity and <br />salinity, and moderately low saturation percentage for acceptable water holding <br />characteristics, and no minor element toxicity problems (see Tab 6, Geology and Overburden <br />Assessment). <br />Maintenance end Testing Procedures. Prior to distribution of soil in the Wolf Creek and <br />deeper Wadge coal areas, final graded areas (on which soil is t o be applied) will be <br />sampled to confirm spoil suitability (see Tab 21, Overburden/Spoil Handling Plan 4or mere <br />details). The density end physical characteri stics of the replaced soil and upper spoil <br />24 Revised 06/19/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.