My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63708
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:09:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
2.04.7(2) Surface Water Information
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />locations are less than one year. Groundwater systems that sustain these springs have small storage <br />volumes relative to the rechazge and dischazge rates. Many of the springs also have dischazge <br />variability that responds to climatic cycles. <br />Almost all bedrock springs issue from the Barren Member and all exhibit seasonal fluctuations. <br />Most Barren Member springs either dry up or nearly dry up during the fall and winter months. <br />The effect of wet and dry climatic cycles also affects the discharge rates of Barren Member <br />springs. Spring dischazge rates from most Barren Member springs are less than 10 gpm during <br />the high-flow season, suggesting that these springs do not have the same high level of hydraulic <br />communication with snowmelt and surface water as do many springs issuing from <br />unconsolidated deposits. The general shape and the seasonal and climatic responses of Barren <br />Member spring hydrographs are similaz to hydrographs of springs issuing from unconsolidated <br />sediments. These facts suggest that the groundwater storage capacities of groundwater systems <br />supporting Barren Member springs aze commonly less than the storage capacities of groundwater <br />systems supporting unconsolidated sediment springs. <br />This spring discussion is based on a study completed by Mayo and Associates in 1999, which is <br />included as Exhibit 18. <br />Reservoirs and Stock Ponds <br />Minnesota and Beaver Reservoirs aze located within or near the coal lease azea, although only <br />• Minnesota Reservoir is excluded from the Federal Lease and the perrnit azea. Minnesota <br />Reservoir is located on the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek near the northern boundary of the <br />South of Divide permit area. Beaver Reservoir on the East Fork of Minnesota Creek is located <br />near the southwestern boundary of the coal lease azea. Map 34 illustrates the locations of the two <br />reservoirs. <br />The Minnesota Dam and Reservoir (also called the Monument Dam) is located on the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek approximately eight miles upstream of Paoma, Colorado. It is owned by the <br />Minnesota Canal and Reservoir Company, and is used for storage of irrigation water. The dam is <br />an earth-fill structure, 76 feet in height, with a crest length of 422 feet. The dam was originally <br />constructed azound 1900. The dam height has been raised twice since its construction; first, in <br />approximately 1910 and again in approximately 1933 to its current height. The reservoir has a <br />surface area of approximately 20 acres at the storage capacity of 467 acre-feet. The drainage area <br />contributing to the reservoir is approximately 5 squaze miles. The reservoir generally fills during <br />the runoff season (May through July) and is drained to a neazly empty condition by autumn. <br />T'he dam and reservoir have been under restrictive orders by the Colorado State Engineer's Office <br />(SEO} since 1980. A restrictive order requires the reservoir be operated under specific constraints. <br />In the case of the Minnesota Dam and Reservoir and based upon the relevant records at the SEO <br />Dam Safety Section, the storage in the reservoir has been limited since that time for a variety of <br />reasons, including; inadequate spillway, seepage on the downstream slope of the embankment, and <br />cracking in the crest and downstream embankment of the dam. Extensive instrumentation <br />• (including monuments, piezometers, and inclinometers) have been installed on the dam. Collected <br />data show that there is an active landslide on the south abutment of the dam. <br />2,04-79 Revised November 2004 PRlO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.