Laserfiche WebLink
Elk <br />• ~~ja W nr (lu itv <br />Streams <br />Based upon the monitoring program previously described, this section provides an overview of <br />the existing streamflow regime for the watersheds in the vicinity of the West Elk Mine. Included <br />are discussions on average annual flows, low flows, peak flows, and issues relating to channel <br />morphology and sediment yield. <br />Streamflow -Most of the streams in the permit area are ephemeral, flowing only in response to <br />snowmelt or significant rainfall events. Using Sylvester Gulch as an example, "significant" <br />rainfall (based on the conceptual-level application of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service curve <br />number (CN) approach), means that a precipitation amount or snowmelt equivalent of about one <br />inch in 24-hours is required to generate runoff. <br />The distribution of flows for the North Fork and Minnesota Creek is shown on Figure 8 and Figure <br />9, respectively. These figures indicate the similarities in the monthly distribution of the annual <br />flows for the North Fork and Minnesota Creek. For both watersheds, over 80 percent of the annual <br />yield occurs from April through July which demonstrates the influence of snowmelt on these <br />streams. <br />While snowmelt provides the greatest yields, summer rainfall can cause lazge peak flows. These <br />storms typically occur during late summer months when many of the ephemeral streams have <br />diminished flows. The peak flows resulting from significant storm events aze the primary <br />mechanism for sediment transport and defining the channel geometry. <br />Within the pemut area, the watersheds appeaz to yield smaller amounts of streamflow than do any <br />of the gaged basins that aze tributary to the North Fork upstream from Somerset. To provide a <br />comparison between the gaged streams on the lease area and other neazby gaged watersheds with <br />longer periods of record, the monthly yield of nine watersheds in the North Fork drainage area were <br />plotted. As shown in Exhibit 18A, the drainage azeas of these watersheds ranged from 1.3 to 63 <br />square miles. Only the two perennial streams, South Prong and Horse Creek, can be properly <br />included in such a comparison. Exhibit 18A shows that these two coal lease area watersheds fall <br />well below the driest annual runoff values of the regional watersheds. Indications aze that these <br />watersheds typically have less runoff per square mile than most watersheds in the region. The gage <br />records support the conclusion that the watersheds in the permit area have very little flow and <br />typically yield less per squaze mile than other regional basins. <br />There are a number of factors potentially responsible for the low annual flows occurring in these <br />streams. The combination of low precipitation and heavy vegetation is important. The dense <br />vegetation leads to a high evapotranspiration rate. The permit azea watersheds receive low <br />precipitation compazed to much of the North Fork basin. Within the North Fork basin, annual <br />precipitation varies from up to 50 inches in the high mountains to 20 inches at Somerset. <br />Drainages within the permit area receive about 22 to 30 inches of precipitation per year. The <br />_ combination of these factors results in a diminution of excess precipitation available for runoff. <br />~~~ <br />2.04-93 Revised November 1004 PRI G <br />