My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63706
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:09:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/3/2007
Doc Name
Response to 2nd Adequacy Review
From
Banks and Gesso, LLC
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Applicant's Response to Second Adequacy Letter <br />Grand River Park Project, DRMS File M-2006-046 <br />January 2, 2007 <br />Page 7 <br />planned quantity and complete, 100 percent survival. The benefits of woody <br />plant enhancements will be achieved at ratios within this range. <br />18. Please provide documentation from the owner of the overhead power line to <br />be relocated that relocation of the line has been authorized. <br />The referenced overhead power line (labeled "Local Electrical Service to be <br />Relocated" on Exhibit C-1) was inadvertently omitted from the list of structure <br />owners on Exhibit C-1. It is unclear if the local electric utility, Holy Cross Energy, <br />continues to actively maintain or exercise ownership interest in the structure. <br />Site investigation subsequent to the production of Exhibit C-1 indicates that the <br />illustrated line may no longer serve to connect service to properties to the west of <br />the subject property. <br />In the interest of full compliance with DRMS Rules, it is assumed that Holy Cross <br />Energy is the structure's owner, and Holy Cross Energy was accordingly <br />contacted. The utility will allow the operator to relocate the line, and <br />documentation to this effect is attached to this adequacy response. <br />19. With respect to the issuance of the TSSP and Well Permit as required by the <br />Office of the State Engineer (OSE), please commit to the following measures: a) <br />Providing the Division with written demonstration of an approved TSSP and Well <br />Permit prior to initiation of de-watering activities at the Silt Pit, and b) Providing <br />the Division with written notice of when de-watering activities have begun at the <br />Silt Pit. <br />At the Division's request, the applicant commits to providing the Division with a <br />written demonstration of an approved TSSP and Well Permit prior to the initiation <br />of de-watering activities at the Grand River Park Project, and will also provide the <br />Division with written notice when de-watering activities have begun or are <br />intended to begin at the Grand River Park Project. <br />20. It is the Division's understanding that no existing wetlands, whether <br />jurisdictional or non jurisdictional, will be mined through during the mining phase <br />and none will be created during the reclamation phase of the Silt Pit. It is also <br />our understanding that there may be jurisdictional as well as non jurisdictional <br />wetlands on site; however, the exact boundaries of these areas have not yet <br />been confirmed by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). Finally, the <br />Division understands that a Corps determination of whether a Corps permit will <br />be needed for the proposed activities has not yet been made. Please confirm if <br />these three (3) assertions are correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.