Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Plan has been finalized in consultation with the BLM and the CDOW (Steigers <br />Corporation, April 1999). Both plans were provided to DMG by letter dated <br />April 16, 1999. The reclamation goals, objectives, and methods are consistent <br />between the two documents, and the Wildlife Mitigation Plan provides <br />additional detail on specific reclamation activities for enhancement of mule deer <br />wintering range and other associated wildlife habitat. The issues raised in this <br />comment are addressed in several places in the Reclamation Plan and the <br />Wildlife Mitigation Plan. <br />Development of the Wildlife Mitigation Plan placed emphasis on the <br />establishment of woody forage for mule deer browse. American Soda, the BLM, <br />and the CDOW have agreed that up to 20 percent of the area requiring <br />reclamation will be specifically dedicated to providing desirable accessions or <br />forms of woody browse species appropriate for mule deer wintering range and <br />other associated wildlife habitat. Reclamation species of choice within these <br />areas would be Wyoming big sagebrush and antelope bitterbrush, with the two <br />species represented about equally. Within these areas, the ultimate goal would <br />be to establish 15 to 20 percent canopy cover of desired shrubs at maturity. <br />Consistent with these goals, composition and density of shrubs to be established <br />in the mining panels and the means used to evaluate progress toward established <br />goals during early stages of shrub development will be determined cooperatively <br />with the BLM and the CDOW in the development of periodic work plans. <br />The Reclamation Plan and the Wildlife Mitigation Plan both acknowledge the <br />challenge of successfully establishing shrubs for wildlife habitat in the presence <br />of highly competitive grasses. if seeded, shrubs such as sagebrush, bitterbrush, <br />and others will likely need to be applied separately and in geographically <br />separate portions of the mining panels in order to minimize competition from <br />more aggressive species and thereby optimize shrub establishment. If grazing by <br />deer or other factors hinder the establishment of desirable woody species, <br />tubelings or larger transplants will be planted in those areas where soil and <br />moisture conditions are suitable for their establishment. <br />It should be pointed out that, in the extensive consultation on this aspect of the <br />Wildlife Mitigation Plan, there was no intention expressed of specifying in detail <br />the methods by which the mule deer wintering range enhancements would be <br />accomplished, such as the DMG suggests in its Item (i) of this comment. The <br />Wildlife Mitigation Plan and the Reclamation Plan both provide operational <br />latitude to meet the objectives of all agencies involved in reclamation, including <br />BLM, the CDOW, and the DMG. As described in most detail in the Wildlife <br />Mitigation Plan, the intention is that specific work plans will be developed on a <br />periodic basis as individual mining panels are closed. The work plans will <br />provide the details for reclamation within the mining panel and for additional <br />~ ~} Apyl.(.~.n AygyMY p..~~ 5 <br />LnYn GuY~ Y Wum Mmtl. Amt <br />Arrwr~>W LLf <br />