My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-04-21_PERMIT FILE - M1999024
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1999024
>
1999-04-21_PERMIT FILE - M1999024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2021 8:13:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:55:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999024
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/21/1999
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LIMITED IMPACT 110 OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U.S. UEPARTHENT OF AGRICULTURE <br />NATURAL~RESUURCEs CONSERVATION SERVICE <br />PAGE i UP 2 <br />• • U6/il/98 <br />Emm~ate -- RANGELAND FkUUUCTIVITY ANU LHRACTEkISTIC PLANT CONNUNITIEs <br />In areas that have similar climate end topography, differences in the kind and amount of vegetation produced on <br />rangeland ere closely related to the kind of soil. Effective management is based on the relationship between <br />the soils and vegetation and voter. This report shoos, for each soil, the range site; the total annual <br />production of vegetation in favorable, normal, and unfavorable years; the characteristic vegetation; and the <br />average percentage of each species. Only those soils that are used as rangeland or are suited to use as <br />rangeland are listed. An ezplanation of the column headings in this report follows. <br />kANGE SITE is a distinctive kind of rangeland that produces a characteristic natural plant community that <br />dttfers from natural giant communities on other range sites in kind, amount and proportion of range plants. <br />The relationship betveeen 50115 and Vegetatl0n was ascertained during this Survey; thU S, range Sltea generally <br />can be determined directly from the soil map. Soil properties that affect moisture supply and giant nutrients <br />have the greatest influence on the productivity of range plants. 'soil reaction, salt content, and a seasonal <br />high eater table are also important. <br />TOTAL PkUUUCiION is the amount of vegetation that can be expected io grow annually on well managed rangeland <br />that is supporting the potential natural plant community. It includes all vegetation, whether or not it is <br />palatable t0 gf8xlnq 8nlmala. It 1nCludeS the current year's 9roVth Of have 5, t~lgs, and frUlts O} g00dy <br />plants. It does not include the increase in stem diameter of trees and shrubs. <br />li is ezpressed in pounds per acre of air-dry vegetation for favorable, normal, end unfavorable years. In a <br />favorable year, the amount and distribution of precipitation end the temperatures make growing conditions <br />substantially better than average. In a normal rear, growing conditions ere about average. In an unfavorable <br />year, growing conditions are well below average, generally because of Lau available soil moisture. Orr veight <br />is the total annual yield per acre of air-dry vegetation. Yields are adjusted to a common percent of air-dry <br />moisture content. The relationship of preen veight to air-dry veight varies according to such factors as <br />ezposure, amount of shade, recent rains, and unseasonable dry periods. <br />CHARACTERISTIC VEGETATION the grasses, fortis, and shrubs that make up most of the potential natural plant <br />community on each soil is listed by common name. <br />Under CUMPOSITiON the ezpected percentage of the total annual production is given for each species making up <br />the characteristic vegetation. The amount that can be used es forage depends an the kinds of grazing animals <br />end on the grazing season. <br />Range management requires a knowledge of the kinds of soil and of the potential natural plant community. It <br />also requires an evaluation of the present range condition. Range condition is determined by comparing the <br />Dresent Diant community with the Dotential natural plant community on a particular range site. The more <br />closely the existing community resembles the potential community, the better the range condition. Range <br />COnd1t10n 15 8n eCOlOg1CBl rating Only. The objective in range management 15 t0 COmtr01 gra21m9 50 [hat the <br />giants growing on a site are about the same in kind and amount as the Dotential natural plant community for <br />that site. SUCK management generally results in the Optimum production of vegetation, control of undesirable <br />brush species, conservation of water, and control of erosion. sometimes, however, a range condition somewhat <br />belov the potential meets grazing needs, provides vildlife habitat, end protects soli and voter resources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.