My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE63160
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE63160
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:21 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:51:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X199016823
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/13/1990
Doc Name
NOI Application W/Exploration & Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Management Summary <br />Metcalf Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (MAC) has completed an <br />archaeological survey of five surface water monitoring locations and associated <br />access in Routt County, Colorado. No cultural resources were found at any of <br />these locations or along any of the associated accesses. The areas surveyed <br />include: <br />Location Number Leg al Location Quadrangle <br /> <br />S1 SE/SE/NE Sec. 16, T5N, R8~w Mount Harris <br />S2 NW/SE/SW Sec. 8, T5N, R87W Plount Harris <br />S3 NE/NW/NW Sec. 30, T5N, R871J Dunkley <br />S4 SW/SlJ/NE Sec. 11, T5N, R88W Mount Harris <br />S5 NE/N[J/NW Sec. 19, T5N, R8']W M1tount Harris <br />Introduction <br />Peabody Coal Company of Flagstaff, Arizona contracted with MAC to conduct <br />a Class III survey of Five surface water monitoring flumes in Routt County, <br />Colorado. A backhoe will be used to excavate a small area for each flume. In <br />each location a 100' x 100' area centered on the staked location was surveyed. <br />Peabody officials felt a 100' x 100' area would be more than adequate for the <br />limited area of disturbance associated with these flume locations. Access <br />routes are, for the most part very limited in length. A 50' corridor was <br />surveyed For access acid these areas, along with the individual flume locations <br />• are shown in Figures 1-3. In one instance a 100' access corridor was surveyed. <br />This was for the flume NS1 in Section 16, TSN, R8'7w. <br />The main objective of this survey was to determine if significant cultural <br />resources would be impacted by Peabody's proposed flume sites and related <br />access. Due to the small area of disturbance involved with these locations, <br />and the limited access, the chance of finding cultural resources was seen as <br />slight, although possible. Further, with projects of this limited scale, <br />avoidance of cultural resources is generally a viable option. No cultural <br />resources were discovered at any of these locations or along any of the access <br />routes. <br />This survey was completed on May 9 and 10, 1990 by Ronald J. Rood and <br />Kimberly Spurr of hfAC. All field notes and other information pertaining to this <br />project are filed at the MAC office in Eagle, Colorado. <br />Environmental Data <br />The entire project area is located within the Southern Rocky Mountains <br />Physiographic Province. Locally, vegetation is primarily sagebrush and <br />oakbrush. Most of the flume locations are within or near drainages where <br />willows and some small stands of aspens were noted. <br />Geologically, the area is primarily rolling to steep with deeply dissected <br />canyons and drainages. Hayden Gulch, along with Dry Creek, Sage Creek and <br />Grassy Creek are major drainages Flowing north towards the Yainpa River: The <br />major geologic Formations in the area ace the Lewis Shale and the Williams Fork <br />. Formation which includes the major coal beds of the regio~i. Currently the <br />project area is used for livestock grazing and coal mining. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.