My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-04-06_PERMIT FILE - M2006034
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2006034
>
2006-04-06_PERMIT FILE - M2006034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 11:55:40 AM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:49:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/6/2006
Doc Name
Limited Impact Op (110(2)
From
Colorado Calumet Company Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site and boundary markings <br />All mining claims in this application are marked with standazd claim mazkers and notices <br />as required by law. Claim boundaries are mazked with posts set at the four corners and at <br />each of the center sides. These posts aze 4 inch by 4 inch, unfinished wood. Discovery <br />posts aze located at the center of each claim. <br />All proposed excavation sites aze marked with 18-inch survey stakes, most with painted <br />red tops. These stakes are set to cover the site azeas as outlined on the maps in Exhibit E. <br />Areas are staked according to GPS locations corresponding to Exhibit E maps. Generally <br />it will not be necessary to excavate the entire site which is staked, nor is this planned. It <br />is uneconomical to do so. The azeas are mazked, that in the case mineralized azeas are <br />encountered which run generally to one side or the other of the center of the proposed <br />excavation site, we will still be able to excavate the planned azea without exceeding the <br />size of excavation site indicated in this application. <br />6.3.3(11(bl Soil composition and depth <br />Soils vary from absent to 3 inches deep in the grassy and lower areas. Most soils under <br />the conifer canopies aze less than linch thick although thick deposits of conifer-needle <br />duff can reach to 6 inches deep locally under some clumps of trees. All soils in this area <br />are naturally acidic soils due to the conifer cover and granitic composition. <br />Much of the soil has been destroyed by the fire, especially on Sites F, G, 7, K, L, M, and <br />N. Even so, all soil will be stockpiled as best as possible and protected by additional <br />subsoil. The addition of carbon to the soil upon reclamation will be beneficial to new <br />growth. <br />Additionally, much of the original soil has been removed and/or mixed into the subsoils <br />over many of the site areas, particularly where extensive, previous, hand digging has <br />occurred. This is true of Sites B, C, D, E, H, I, and L. <br />All soil, where present, will be scraped from the proposed excavations and stored <br />immediately to either side of the proposed excavation (see Exhibit E -Maps). Generally <br />about 8 inches of soil and subsoil will be stockpiled as suitable for growth medium. <br />Additional subsoil may be stockpiled over the growth-medium soil to prevent possible <br />wind erosion. As the subsoil and soil is re-spread after mining, the topsoil becomes the <br />uppermost layer and is ready for seeding. <br />Due to the nature of silicate deposits, no mineral matter is encountered during the mining <br />process which is detrimental to plant growth. Therefore, the waste rock does not become <br />problematic. Instead, the potassium and sodium feldspazs and the potassium micas which <br />aze naturally decomposing from the granite aze releasing these ions as nutrients. The <br />major difference as the deposits are penetrated, is the absence of organic material the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.