Laserfiche WebLink
RESOURCE :10. S~ll'947 <br />page 2 <br />III: BESE.+,F.CH ?,?:D `L~VAGE1!E?IT: 16) Completed: record XS collet[ RE map t,~test <br />art. excav. total excav. stabilized other <br />17) ;fanagement Recommendations: avoid- map- collect- test- part. excav._ <br />total excav. no further work ~~ other If the site is to be impacted b}• construction <br />*activities, monitoring is recommended. If construction activity comes within 50 ft. (see bel:-• <br />18) Research potential/significance The site appears to be badly disturbed from gravel <br />-quarry eoerations surrounding the site, plus possible vandalism by pot hunters. <br />19) Supervision: none marked fenced patrolled access controlled;{X other <br />Access controlled by Trapper `tine personnel. <br />20) Known Collections/Excavations/Publications None. <br />21) Informan <br />IV. ADTtIVISTR=.T?VE D:1T,~: <br />•22) Surface Collection: yes` no };~ % collected sampling technique: none grab <br />random transect other describe <br />23) Artifact Storage <br />24) Recorder M. Floodman 7.5) Date(s) 7 / 7 / 80 <br />V. ADDITIO`!AL I?'FOIL~L4TI0\: Site originally extended further west. The western portion was <br />destroyed b}- the blading of a road to nearby gravel pits, The artifacts were found <br />along the edge of this bladed area. The site may have ertended Further east; hocoever, <br />no artifacts were found in the cultivated field, It probably also extended further <br />north into the immediately adjacent quarry area, as some artifacts •aere found there as <br />well. <br />* of the site, the site should be fenced. <br />• <br />29 <br />