My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE62818
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE62818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:09:05 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/16/2001
Doc Name
PRE-HEARING ORDER FN M-2001-038 BENNETT SAND & GRAVEL PIT 2 112C PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
BENNETT SAND & GRAVEL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Note: The Division of Minerals and Geology ("Division") shall not be a party, but shall <br />participate in the hearing as staff to the Boazd. <br />III. ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED <br />Presentations to the Board shall be strictly limited to the issue of whether the pending application <br />complies with the requirements of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of <br />Construction Materials, Sections 34-32.5-101 et sec .., C.R.S. (1999) ("Construction Materials <br />Act") and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Boazd. The parties shall limit <br />presentations to the question of whether the pending application should be approved or denied, <br />based on the issues stated below. <br />Has the applicant provided an adequate reclamation plan addressing the backfilling and <br />grading, topsoiling and revegetation? (Sec. 34-32.5-116(4)(a), (b), (f) and (g)) <br />2. Will the operation minimize disturbances to the hydrologic balance of the alluvial <br />aquifers in the Kiowa-Bijou or Lost Creek Basins? (Sec. 34-32.5-116(4)(h)) <br />Will the operation adversely affect impacts to wildlife, specifically deer, and the roosting <br />bald eagles? (Rule 6.4.8(1)) <br />IV. ISSUES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED <br />All other issues raised by the parties that are not included in the list above will not be considered <br />by the Board, either because the concern has been addressed or because the issue is outside the <br />jurisdiction and authority of the Board under the Construction Materials Act. <br />V. WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS <br />Rules 2.7.1(2)(d) and (e) require that pre-heazing orders contain lists of all witnesses and exhibits <br />that the parties will introduce at the hearing. The purpose of this rule is to ensure that parties are <br />given an opportunity to prepaze replies or rebuttals to the materials offered by other parties. If <br />any parties to this matter submitted lists under that rule, those lists aze attached to this order. Any <br />party that wishes to view another party's exhibits should contact that party or the party's <br />Attorney of Record. <br />The parties shall note that if no witness or exhibit lists were submitted by a party at the Pre- <br />hearing Conference, that party may not introduce any exhibits or present any witnesses at the <br />final heazing in this matter without express permission from the Boazd. <br />All documents, exhibits and photographs presented as evidence at the Formal Public Heazing <br />will become part of the administrative record. Upon request, a party may recover any evidence <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.