Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Division of Minerals <br />Attn: Ma. Kamnikar <br />September 26, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />and Geology <br />volumes for development, <br />phases (Rule 6.4.7(3)). <br />each source of water to <br />(Rule 6.4.7(4)). Outline <br />retention ponds (Rules 3 <br />and 6.4.4(c). <br />mining, processing & reclamation <br />Indicate the projected amount from <br />supply project water requirements <br />Mans for and locations of any water <br />1.6(1)(a) and (b), 3.1.6(2), 3.1.7 <br />Establish a groundwater-monitoring program to establish <br />baselines and to protect groundwater quality and monitor <br />groundwater level (Rules 3.1.5(10) and (11), 3.1.6(1) (a) and <br />(b) and 3.1.7). <br />Reference Exhibits "C" "D" and "E" include estimates for <br />water consumption and plans for discharge and/or retention <br />(Rules 3.1.7(6)(b)(ii) and 3.1.7(2) and (4)). Mr. Phillips <br />stated in the Arapahoe County meeting of 6-26-00, that some <br />water would be required for screening and that water would be <br />retained on some basis in retention ponds, although the extent <br />and location of said ponds was not specified. This is in <br />direct conflict with the second paragraph of "Water diversion <br />and impoundments" of Exhibit "D". Further stipulate that no <br />reagent use is planned per Mr. Phillips (Rules 3.1.5(11) and <br />3.1.7 (6) (b) (ii) (B)) . <br />3. Mining Plan and Mining Plan Map. Both the maps and the <br />written portions of the application need to delineate the <br />actual acreage mined, disturbed & undisturbed (Rule 6.4 .3(d)). <br />Verify that the differential volume between the existing and <br />reclaimed topography, as contoured by the applicant, actually <br />provides the bases for the raw cut and fill volume <br />calculations on sheets 3J4 and 4/4 (Exhibits "C"). <br />Reference Exhibit "C", sheet 1/4, FLOOD PLAIN, DRAINAGE AND <br />STORM WATER QUALITY, Section 8, both the Urban Drainage and <br />Flood Control District in their letter dated 1-27-00 and Mr. <br />Steve Gardner/Arapahoe County Division of Engineering in the <br />Arapahoe County meeting of 6-26-00, specifically addressed <br />preserving the unnamed tributary and the need for conformance <br />with the "Coyote Run and Upper Box Elder Creek Outfall Systems <br />Planning Study" (OS P). Neither the description nor the maps <br />in Exhibit "C" acknowledge the existence of the OSP, address <br />