Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r~ <br />RESULTS AP!D DISCUSSIOP! <br />Vegetation cover, production and density means are discussed <br /> <br /> <br />for each separate reference area and its corresponding vegetation <br />type. Dominant species are selected for each type based on cover, <br />production and density means. These dominant species are discussed <br />in relation to their physical environment. <br />The P?axwell !4ine, including the grassland and pinyon-juniper <br />types will be discussed first. Table 1 sho~vs the mean cover values <br />for the grassland reference area. Bouteloua oracilis had a mean <br />cover value of 31.3`,x, Artemisia fri ida had a mean cover value of . <br />7.5`.S, Carex eleocharis had a mean cover value of 3.595, and <br />Xanthocephalum sarothrae had a mean cover value of 2.7a. The remain- <br />ing grasses and fortis had mean cover values of 1.8"S and below. Total <br />mean cover for the grassland site vas 52.3'x. Bare around accounted <br />for 33.5;5 of sampled areas, litter accounted for 14.09;, and rock <br />accounted for 0.2`5. (Tables are found in Appendix B.) <br />Production means for the grassland type are given in Table 2. <br />Bouteloua gracilis had a mean production value of 23.5 gins/m2. <br />Artemisia frigida had a mean production value of 8.1 gms/m2, <br />Astr•agalus missouriensis had a mean production value of 5.9 gms/m2, <br />Xanthocephalum sarothrae had a mean production value of 4.9 gins/nit, <br />and Carex eleocharis had a mean production value of 3.7 gms/int. The <br />remaining species had mean production values of 1.5 gms/m2 and beloo-i. . <br />Total mean production for the grassland site vas 52.5 gms/m2. <br />8 <br />