PERMFILE62336 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~i STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 866-3567 fAX: (303) 832-8106 July 11, 2002 Brian D. McGill Rio Grande Portland Cement Company PO BOX 100 Tijeras, NM 87059-0100 Subject: Clarification of Recent Submittal Regarding M-2002-004 Red Rock Cement Plant and Limestone Mine Technical Revision Mr. Brian McGill DIVISION O F MINERALS GEOLOGY RECLAMATION MINING•SAFETY Bill Owens Governor Greg E. Walther Executive Direttor Ronald W. Canany Acting Di/rsion Director The division received your responses to our preliminazy adequacy review on July 8, 2002. We aze in the process of reviewing the responses and will notify you of any additional concerns if necessary. One point of clarification that needs to be addressed is the administrative form ofthe response. Normally, responses to adequacy questions are provided as clarification to the original submittal and do not require a sepazate administrative action. On occasion, the response could entail a substantial enough change to the original application so as to be submitted as a technical revision to the application or even an amendment to the application. These types of changes carry with them additional fees and notification requirements. The majority of the responses in your submittal will not be considered as either technical revisions or amendments from an administrative standpoint. Therefore, a short clarification letter stating that the July 8`I' submittal is neither a technical revision nor an amendment should be provided. We understand that these responses are technical in nature and do amend the original submittal, however, the terms technical revision and amendment have specific administrative meaning in our rules and regulations and we do not believe that the July 8t° response is intended to be either. Furthermore, it is our interpretation that these responses do not constitute a technical revision or amendment to the application. With that said, as previously discussed with Mr. Seby and Mr. Devoe, one area that will be considered an administrative technical revision, thereby requiring a sepazate cover letter and fee, is the change for disposal of the plant site demolition materials from off- site to on-site. Please provide a separate submittal that addresses this change with the appropriate fee ($188.00). This submittal can reference the various sections that have already been changed in the July 8`s submittal, however, it must also agree to comply