My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE62241
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE62241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:41 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Report of Subsidence Study (6/83) and Addendum
Section_Exhibit Name
VOLUME 3- SUBSIDENCE STUDY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on this evidence, we consider that all mining areas <br />• where total extraction is practiced and where less than 800 <br />feet of overburden overlies the coal seam should be <br />considered to have a high risk of subsidence cracks <br />developing at the surface. <br />8.2 PREDICTED IMPACTS ON RESOURCES, STRUCTURES AND <br />FACILITIES <br />Most of the land under which mining will occur is <br />currently used for relatively low intensity agricultural <br />purposes such as forestland, rangeland and grazing, with <br />limited local hay production. These activities should not be <br />sensitive to the effects of subsidence and are unlikely to <br />be adversely affected directly. However, to the extent that <br />these activities depend on water, there will be a negative <br />impact on them if necessary water sources aye disrupted. <br />Subsidence cracks, while open, would pose a c:anger to the <br />cattle or wildlife before they are filled and healed by <br />natural processes. <br />Surface water resources consist of stock ponds and <br />surface streams. These should be unaffected by changes in <br />surface gradients or total subsidence resulting from <br />development of a subsidence profile. The ponds could be <br />• damaged and drained by a subsidence crack that would occur <br />directly below the pond. The probability of such an event is <br />very low and the pond could be easily repaired. The streams <br />could be disrupted by the subsidence cracks; such disruption <br />could occur at any of the North Fork tributaries. Obviously, <br />East Roatcap Creek and Stevens Gulch are the two important <br />drainages that are endangered by such a possibility. <br />Ground water within the Mesaverde Formation has been <br />found to be of limited extent, occurring only as isolated <br />perched water bearing zones. These zones are not currently <br />exploited and, because of their limited extent, have no <br />potential for future development. Disruption of local, <br />perched water bearing zones may occur due to mining where <br />they lie in the immediate vicinity of the mine roof, <br />although, because of the nature of this ground water, this <br />will not constitute an impact on the area's resources. <br />The most significant ground water resour:e identified <br />consists of the alluvial deposits of Stevens Gulch, which <br />supplies water to CwI and other users. There is the <br />potential that subsidence cracks due to mining could drain <br />this aquifer; its protectior. would probably require adequate <br />changes in mining mathods below the area. <br /> <br />J: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.