Laserfiche WebLink
• Groundwater discharges from the western backfill area have not <br />reached steady-state levels. This is primarily due to the fact <br />that the large strip of open pit exists in the middle of this <br />area which would tend to intercept flows from the updip portion <br />of the backfill. Once this area is fully reclaimed, a ground- <br />water flow system similar to that existing in the eastern <br />backfill area would be expected to develop. Projections of the <br />potential discharge area may be based on this assumption. The <br />area of recharge for the western backfill is approximately 8.5 x <br />10'ft~ With similar recharge rates that appear to be prevalent <br />in the eastern backfill, the western area would be expected to <br />eventually yield a total annual recharge volume ,of about 2.1 x 10' <br />ft3(Appendix II,D). If this area also has the characteristic of <br />approaching a closed system, then a large proportion of this <br />volume would be expected to be discharged. This volume is <br />projected to be equivalent to an annual average discharge rate of <br />300gpm based on comparison with the eastern backfill area. <br />A similar fluctuation in discharge rate seen at the eastern area <br />is likely to be seen in the western area. Peak discharge rates <br />will tend to eventually reach approximately 2500gpm. The average <br />discharge during this high flow period is projected to be about <br />1300gpm. Discharges during the majority of the year are project- <br />ed to be about 100gpm. Total backfill discharges form the entire <br />Eckman Park operation are thus projected to vary between 180 and <br />• 4500gpm through the year with an average rate of about SOOgpm. <br />Water quality of the western backfill discharges <br />similar to that seen at the Pond F Spring. <br />projected discharge from the backfill areas <br />average dissolved solids concentration of about <br />loading to Foidel Creek of approximately 3700 <br />projected to result from backfill discharge at <br />operation. <br />Salt Load Analysis <br />will probably be <br />Using the total <br />and assuming an <br />4000mg/1., a salt <br />tons per year is <br />the Eckman Park <br />Records of flow in Foidel Creek, upstream from the major mine <br />related discharges, are available from the USGS gaging station <br />09243800. Prior to 1980, flow was usually only measurable for <br />about four months of the year, following the spring snowmelt <br />period. After 1980, discharges from CYCC's Eckman Park mine at <br />Pond A resulted in an extended period of flow at the USGS site. <br />Downstream from the site, contributions to Foidel Creek occur at <br />the discharge points of several sediment ponds associated with <br />the CYCC Eckman Park and Mine No. 1 operations and the Twentymile <br />Coal Company (TCC) Foidel Creek Mine. The major discharges occur <br />from sediment Ponds D and F. Discharge of groundwater inflow to <br />the adjacent Foidel Creek underground mine occurs via Pond D. <br />Overflow of the flooded Area 2 Pit also contributes to Foidel <br />• Creek via sediment Pond D. The major source of inflow to the <br />Area 2 Pit is discharge from updip backfilled areas. Discharge <br />14 <br />