Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PART II <br />Page No. 27 <br />Permit No.: CO-00321 IS <br />The duration of a permit shall be for a fixed terrrt and shall not exceed five (5) yeazs. Filing of a timely and complete <br />application shall cause the expued permit to continue in force to the effective date of the new permit. The permit's duration <br />maybe extended only through administrative extensions and not through interim modifications. <br />15. Section 307 Toxics <br />If a,toxic effluent standazd or prohibition, including any applicable schedule of compliance specified, is established by <br />regulation pursuant to Section 307 of the Federal Act for a toxic pollutant which is present in the pemrittee's dischazge and <br />such standazd or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in the dichazge permit, the Division <br />shall institute proceedings to modify or revoke and reissue the permit to conform to the toxic efluent standazd or prohibition. <br />16. Antibackslidin¢ <br />a. A permit may not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section 25-8- <br />503(1)(b) (BPJ) of the Water Quality Control Act, which are less stringent than the comparable effluent limitations or <br />standazds in the previous permit, unless any one of the following exceptions is met and Ute conditions of pazagraph (c) of <br />this section aze met: <br />i) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the pemtitted facility occurred after permit issuance which justify <br />the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or <br />ii) Information is available which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations, <br />guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a less stringent effluent limitation or <br />standazd at the time of permit issuance; or <br />iii) The Division determines that technical mistakes or mistaken interpretations of law were made in issuing the permit, <br />which justified relaxation of the effluent limitations or standards; or <br />iv) A less stringent effluent limitation or standard is necessary because of events over which the perinittee has no control <br />and for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />v) The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />vi) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities requved to meet the effluent limitations in the previous permit and <br />has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous effluent <br />limitations, in which case, the limitations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect the level of <br />pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent guidelines in effect at the <br />time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />b. A pemrit may not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to 61.8(2(b) or (c) of <br />the Colorado Discharge Pemvt System Regulations that are less stringent than the cotparable effluent limitations in the <br />previous permit, unless any of the exceptions provided herein is met and [he conditions of pazagraph c. of this section are <br />met. <br />i) In waters where the applicable water quality standard has not yet been attained, efluent limitations based on a total <br />maximum daily load or other waste load allocation maybe revised to be less stringent if dre cumulative effect of all <br />such revisions assures attainment of such water quality standard, or the designated use which is not being attained is <br />removed in accordance with Section 31.6 of the Basic Standards. <br />ii) In waters where the applicable water quality standard has been attained, effluent limitations based on a total <br />maximum daily load, other waste load allocation, or any other permitting standard (including any water quality <br />standard) maybe revised to be less stringent if such revision is subject to and consistent with the antidegradation <br />provisions of Section 31.8 of the Basic Standazds. Consistency with Section 31.8 shall be presumed if the waters in <br />question have been designated by the Cotmnission as "use protected' ; or <br />iii) Whether or not the applicable water quality standard has been attained: <br />(A) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance which <br />justified the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or <br />(B) A less stringent effluent limitation is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no control and <br />for which there is not reasonable available remedy: or <br />