Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />C~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of .~alural Resources <br />7 311 Sherman 51 . Room ' 15 <br />Denier. Colorado 80]03 <br />Phone i703~066-356: <br />F4i 1307183_'8106 <br />November I8, 1998 <br />Rov Romer <br />Crnernor <br />• <br />• <br />Ms. Michelle Rehmann <br />[nternation Uranium (USA) Corp. <br />1050 Seventeenth St ,Suite 950 <br />Denver CO 80265 <br /> <br />Re: Van 4 Shaft, File No. M-97-032, Technical Adequacy Review Letter. <br />Dear Ms. Rehmann, <br />published the required notice and mailed notices to all adjacent owners of property <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPART,titENT Oi <br />NATURAi <br />RESOURCE <br />wme, s Locnnead <br />E.ecume Over for <br />~hc haelB Lone <br />D~. Gaon Dne~mr <br />Your last submittal, of the items required for the above-named permit application to be found <br />complete, has been received. You were sent a letter dated l l/3/98 notifying you of that, plus that <br />the Division's decision date on the application is set for 1213/98. Please ensure that you have <br />I phoned you last week to discuss the decision date. I left a message regarding the possibility of <br />you waiving the right to a 30-day decision (meaning a request for an extension of the decision <br />date). My call to you was made after amining-related incident was reported to our office, which <br />incident could possibly demand your full and timely attention, thereby giving responses to this 30- <br />day review a lower priority. Since I received no response to that call, [ am reiterating my concern <br />herein, which is that a lack of timely response could cause the denial of the application. <br />[ have included in this letter numerous items which must be answered or clarified before the <br />Division can approve the application. Please note that if no timely response is received from you, <br />or the response is inadequate, the Division's decision will have to be to deny this application <br />Also, we received a letter from Montrose County, dated 8/13/98, which included concerns about <br />the application materials. The topics of concern appear to fall within the purview of the Division. <br />Since we have no record of a written response from you or resolution of the concerns, we will <br />include those concerns in our adequacy review. if your responses are satisfactory to the Division, <br />Montrose County stated that there will be no formal written objection filed. <br />Most of the specific area in your application is already included in the permitted acreage for a <br />permit called the Thunderbolt Group, permit no. M-77-287, operated by Umetco. <br />My questions and concerns are listed below in the order of the application item or exhibit to <br />which they pertain. <br />