My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61897
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:24 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:20:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
VEGETATION REFERENCE AREA STUDY
Section_Exhibit Name
1996 APPENDIX C
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 2 <br />Mr. Cass Legal <br />June 23, 1980 <br />At least three reference areas will be required for the mine. Both the aspen <br />and the oakbrush communities will require reference areas. Although the <br />remaining three mountain shrub associations are sufficiently similar to allow <br />the use of a single reference area~you may find, after some preliminary sampling, <br />that you will wish to use two. There is a trade-off which you must consider <br />here: The greater the variation which is encompassed within a mapping unit, <br />the larger the sample size becomes to meet sampling adequacy. At a certain <br />point, you will find that less total sampling will be necessary, if the mapping <br />unit is subdivided. This is a determination which you or your consultant vill <br />have to make. <br />A wet meadow plant community is shown on the vegetation map. You requested <br />that the reference area requirement be waived for this community. In order to <br />grant your request, the areal extent of this community must be small (tenta- <br />tively defined as 2 to 3b or less of the total disturbed area), and the com- <br />munity must not constitute critical or unique habitat. Your permanent program <br />application should include a discussion of the reasons why you feel these <br />criteria are met. <br />• The establishment of reference areas for the H-G Mine is complicated by the <br />extent of the existing disturbance. In order to handle this situation, I <br />would suggest that the sampling program include not only the area which is <br />yet to be disturbed, but same adjacent area as well. A reasonable choice for <br />the study area boundary woul e e perm t oundary. For example, in establish- <br />ing an aspen reference area, your sampling should include not only the single <br />aspen stand which is yet to be disturbed, but also other aspen stands within <br />the permit area which will not be disturbed. This approach will probably <br />increase your variance and therefore your sample size, but you will obtain a <br />better overall estimate of cover and production, which could reasonably be <br />expected to be representative of those aspen stands which have already been <br />disturbed. Increasing the sampling base will also make it easier for you to <br />find an aspen reference area which will satisfy the statistical comparability <br />requirement. <br />You have expressed considerable concern that the reference area you select <br />may not satisfy the statistical comparability requirement. I believe that <br />you are over-estimating the magnitude of this problem. To select a reference <br />area which will satisfy our requirements, you should first study the existing <br />soils, vegetation and topographic maps in order to select an area which is <br />representative based on these criteria. The second step should be a visual <br />inspection. Locations which are obviously unsuitable could be thrown out <br />at this point. Finally, you may wish to do some preliminary sampling from <br />• several potential sites to narrow your choices still further. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.