My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61829
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:21 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:18:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999021
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
PRE HEARING ORDER IN THE MATTER OF POUDRE TECH AGGREGATE INC THE STEGNER FARMS MINE SITE FN M-99-021
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Stegner Gravel Pit, Application #M-99-021, Parties and Ctbjections List <br />Parties: <br />Poudre Tech Aggregates Inc. <br />Representatives: Martin Lind, Poudre Tech Aggregates Inc.; Paul Banks, Banks & Gesso, Inc. <br />(consultant) <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Representatives: H. Bruce Humphries. Christina Kamniktr <br />Objectors <br />Major Boddicker <br />Dave Slatten <br />Ginger Slatten <br />Jack L. Dickson <br />Bernard G. Henrie <br />In addition to the Division's concerns (see the April 30 Technical Adequacy Review) the following issues <br />should be addressed: <br />The Division received comments from the Division of Wi dlife, stating [hat they had no problem with the <br />location of the proposed excavations, but they did recommend that the shoreline be maximized by using an <br />irregular shaped during final reclamation, and reclaiming the slopes to no steeper than 3H:1 V grade. They <br />also suggested stocking the ponds with fish and constructi ag an underwater topography/swcture to <br />encourage growth of vegetation and invertebrates, and tha. all care should be taken to preserve as many <br />trees on the property as possible. <br />The comments from objectors to the application can be su nmarized as follows: <br />concerns about impacts of mining on groundwater in the area (mostly concerned [hat there will be a drop in <br />available water resources); <br />noise; <br />dust; <br />increased traffic along the road; <br />fear of a decrease in property values; <br />and concerns and questions about the final reclamation plan, proposed timeframes, and end land-use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.