My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61656
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:11 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 04e-3 Northern Mining District Subsidence Evaluation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SubTerra, Inc. Twen[ymile Coal Company 05/31/00 <br />Northern Mining District Subsidence Evaluation -Final Report <br />4. The start profile for Panel 14-Right was estimated using data from monitoring lines <br />• 1000 and 3000 in the Fish Creek study area (panels 1 LLW and 2LLV~. These data <br />are contained in the semi-annual reports and in prior permit submittals. <br />Subsidence predictions were made for overburden thickness of 800, 1,100 and 1,400 ft <br />representing the range of conditions in the study area. The results of these predictions are <br />contained in Figures 2, 2A, and 3. Summary data include: <br />• Maximum subsidence over 12 Right of 56, 62, and 70 inches for overburden <br />thickness of 1,400, 1,100, and 800 ft, respectively. It is noted that the 800-ft <br />overburden condition only exists at the start of panel 12 Right. <br />• Maximum subsidence over second and subsequent panels of 60 and 67 inches for <br />overburden thickness of 1,400 and 1,100 ft, respectively. <br />• Up-dip and down-dip draw angles of 12° and 21° respectively, which define the limits <br />of subsidence. <br />• Maximum surface strains less than -0.004 (compression) and +0.005 (extension). <br />2.1 Subsidence Monitoring Requirements <br />As noted above, CTCC has developed an extensive subsidence data base from monitoring lines <br />positioned to measure start, transverse, and traveling subsidence profiles. No further <br />systematic subsidence data gathering is therefore warranted. <br />However, it is recommended that CTCC monitor subsidence adjacent to the Energy Spur track, <br />. as part of their remedial activities, and along Fish Creek. Specific recommendations are <br />provided in the following sections. <br />3. Evaluation of Impacts to the Energy Spur Track <br />The Energy spur runs from the mine loading yard, across the eastern mining district to the south <br />of the NMD and thence north-eastwards across Panels 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16-Right. The <br />layout of the Energy Spur track relative to the NMD mine workings is shown on Drawing 1. <br />The track was previously undermined by longwall panels in the Eastern mining district during <br />August of 1996 (Panel 9-Right), during June and July of 1997 (Panel 8-Right), and then again <br />during June, 1998 (Panel 7-Right). Complete re-leveling of the Energy Spur track was <br />accomplished during 9-Right undermining due primarily to concerns over grade steepening. <br />Partial re-leveling, with the approval of the Railroad, was successfully practiced during 8-Right <br />undermining. Panel 7-Right ended immediately beneath the Energy Spur track resulting in <br />limited subsidence (< 22 inches) and temporary and permanent differential gradients that were <br />within the limits established for this type of track and/or the pre-existing conditions. Differential <br />gradients actually improved during undermining and track re-leveling during undermining was <br />not required. <br /> <br />PN: 98-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.