Laserfiche WebLink
<br />both. As is stated in Comment #20, the drilling and completion of wells has the potential to <br />affect ground water quality. The potential affects could occur due to commingling of aquifers <br />along the well bores. No other activities proposed during development of the surface facilities <br />have a reasonable potential to adversely affect ground water. The correct permit conditions <br />protective of ground water relative to the potential for commingling along a bore are practice <br />based conditions. The reclamation permit application requires the well casings be cemented <br />along their entire leneth, and that cement logs be run and mechanical integrity testing be <br />conducted. Each well completion must be certified and a construction report with all logging <br />and testing results provided in accordance with the regulations for Environmental Protection <br />Facilities (Rule 7.3) and the terms of the permit application. Practice based permit conditions, by <br />their nature, do not require water quality baseline or monitoring. <br />The activities proposed in the permit application that may affect ground water and that will <br />require permit conditions protective of ground water in the form of numeric protection levels are <br />all related to the requirement to isolate production fluid from the aquifers. No production fluid <br />will be generated until heated barren solution is injected into the mining interval. Injection of <br />solution is prohibited in the permit application until the ground water characterization study-is <br />complete. Thus the baseline ground water information collected during the study will be valid, <br />pre-mining ambient quality data, which can then be applied in the development of numeric <br />protection levels for on-going monitoring. In objecting to the approval of the application, the <br />commentors state that DMG will be vulnerable to pressure to establish less stringent standards if <br />she standards are established after the project is underway. However, there is no subjectivity in <br />the establishment of numeric protection levels. If the ambient quality is at concentrations lower <br />than the ground water standard for a particular parameter, then the standard becomes the <br />protection level. If the ambient quality is at concentration in excess of the standard, due to <br />natural orpre-existing anthropogenic contamination, then the numeric protection level is set at <br />the ambient quality. This narrative standard, as well as the table value standards for ground <br />water are established by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. Also, in the case of <br />the American Soda proposal any detectable release of production fluid to ground water would <br />require corrective action, regardless of whether ground water standards are exceeded. <br />Based on the foregoing discussion, it is not necessary to delay development of surface facilities <br />at the Yankee Gulch Project to collect the required five quarters of ground water baseline <br />information. Such a delay would not improve in any way the DMG's ability to require permit <br />conditions protective of the ground water resource. <br />Comment #21 Disposal well influence on baseline data <br />DiVIG Response: The disposal well is operated under an underground injection control <br />authorization from EPA unrelated to the solution mining activities proposed in the reclamation <br />permit application. Any affect on ground water caused by the operation of the disposal well <br />would be a component of the premining baseline condition. No disposal wells are proposed in <br />the reclamation permit application under consideration. <br />