PERMFILE61560 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

From :ENVIRONMENT, [NC. . PHONE No. 3H3 423 7599 • Er~vi roan? er~~t, LARRY E. O'BRIAN CRE8IDENT March 24, 1998 Me. Catharine Kraeger-Rovey Chairman Mf.ned 7.an[1 Reclamation Board 1313 Sherman st RM 215 Denver, CO 60275 Dwar. Madam ChAlrpwraon; REr Siloam stone Permit Applfoation Bedrook Hine Ifl - M-97-086 Mar. 22 1998 4:SSRM P02 Iqc. 7oeS VANCE DRIVE, $VITE C06A ARVADA, COLORADO BOOOJ 3D3-G23.72i7 This latter eontaine our comments on the Propoacd Final Decision for the above referenced mine. We feel there era items in tlxe FINAL DECISION ORDER that arc not technically correct. I will address eaoh item where we have ooncerns 1n the order presented. The items in CAPITOL LETTERS ero the changed language we peel is necessary to make this order tochnicelly correct. The first ~1[a[lye is in Me. Gallet'8 cover letter. She refers Lo L11is operation es tl,e "Siloam Stone Pit" the official name of L'lxis mining operation is Siloam Stone, I[[c. - HEDROCx MINK N1. Title of order reads "in the matter of the Siloam Stone pit epplicatton••. To be correct it should refer to a known mining ~ operation and so should read "in the matter of the Siloam Stone, Inc. - BEDROCK MINE ~1 application" Pnqe 1 last paragraph first line - Steven should be STEVAN FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. We want to avoid any confusion in the future and to refer to this area es °Little Owl Canyon or Peck Canyon'• is Incor- rect. This site i8 known as SECTION 36, TOWNSlIIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST, 6TIi P.M. PUEDLO COUNTY, CO. We have re- aenrched numerous County, State end Federal Maps end cannot find any geologic or reference names, like t1[oee used in this document, in L1le area around the mine. To be L•echni- cally correct and Por Puture reference we went the order to reflect the terms used in our application.