My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61457
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987074
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/15/1987
Doc Name
DOTSERO BLOCK INC BLM LETTER
From
ENVIRONMENT INC
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ ~ <br />Egviroqmeqt, Iqc. <br />LARRY E. O'BRIAN <br />-t[tID[tT <br />July 14, 1987 <br />Mr. Carl Mount <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 423 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Mount: <br />Re: Dotsero Block, Inc., BLM letter. <br />9989 WEST 80TH AVENUE <br />ARVADA COLORADO 80004 <br />3b3-423-7297 <br />R~~~~ QED <br />~~l 15 1987 <br />REC~M~ ~ p~~ p psro <br />N <br />This is in response to the letter dated June 11, 1987 from the <br />Glenwood Springs office of the BLM. I will answer their concerns <br />as they are outlined in the letter. <br />1. Mr. Whitman met with Mr. Dan Sokal on 6/22/87 and worked out <br />a way to locate the northwest and southwest corners of Claim <br />S 7. The BLM agreed it was to expensive to survey in and <br />suggested placing pipes on the approximate corners. <br />2. We have no problem with this as long as the BLM does not <br />delay mining because they do not mark the area where trees are <br />to be removed. We recognized in the application that BLM was <br />selling the trees and we will actually benefit from the removal <br />by outside parties as it saves us the expense of removing them. <br />3. This again is no problem we will submit copies of the MLRB <br />annual report to the BLM. We believe MLRB requirements are <br />more stringent than what the BLM is asking for. <br />4. If the BLM would rather have their seed mixture used, far be <br />it from us to argue with them. We assumed the shrub species <br />would be more desireable but we are requesting the following <br />seed mixture be substituted and approved for use over the <br />mixture in the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.