My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61378
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:08:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978066
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/16/1980
Doc Name
RIO GRANDE CNTY GRAVEL PITS 10 MILE SOUTH PIT 78-66
From
RIO GRANDE CNTY
To
MLR
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT A & B
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V <br />To: James L. Schm~ing, Reclamation Specialist • <br />RE: Rio Grande Co gravel pits <br />Pg: 2 <br />b. Not applicable <br />c. The direction of mining will depend upon the quality and quantity <br />of gravel as it is uncovered, and cannot be predicted. <br />Acreage of Affected Land for all 6 pits <br />The maximum acreage which will be disturbed, from and after July 1, <br />1976, in each gravel pit, will be nine acres. Extraction operations <br />will cease when nine acres have been disturbed since July 1, 1976, <br />and reclamation operations will be completed within a reasonably short <br />time (as required by statute and the Mined Land Reclamation Board) <br />after extraction operations have ceased. <br />4. <br />a. vegetation-we nave requested to <br />. vegetation and the surrounding <br />b. Soils-We have requested the SCS <br />and the surrounding area. <br />nventory each pit for <br />area. <br />to inventory each pit for soils <br />c. We have no objection to a vegetation and soils inventory by the SCS, <br />but we wonder why such inventories are needed, since you have already <br />suggested the type and amount of seed for reclamation. <br />5. Reclamation Plan for all 6 pits, Exhibit E <br />a. None of the pits have sufficient topsoil to make stockpiling and re- <br />placement of topsoil feasible. No topsoil has been stockpiled for <br />later replacement in any of the areas worked prior to 1976, due to <br />insufficient or nonexistent topsoil. <br />b. The final grade in all the pits will be 5 to 1. <br />c. The County Commissioners have serious questions concerning how you <br />can recommend a certain mixture of five different seeds for reclama- <br />tion of the six gravel pits if you have not visited the pits, and <br />made some study in regard to the unique conditions of each pit. Mark <br />Haffner, Supervising Mined Land Reclamation Specialist, wrote the <br />then Chairrnan of the Board of County Cornrnissioner•s of Rio Grande County <br />a letter dated September 8, 1978, in which he stated that the sites <br />should be visited before your agency would say what should be done in <br />order to reclaim these areas. He also stated "In my experience, every <br />site has many solutions. The problem is selecting the solution that <br />will produce the best result for the least expenditure in money and <br />effort". <br />The Board of County Commissioners feels very strongly that you, as a Reclama- <br />tion Specialist, should visit this area and observe each of these pits in order <br />to give the County proper assistance in developing a reclamation plan, if you <br />do not feel that the reclamation plan submitted is sufficient. <br />As stated above, the Board's position is that the law requires that the permits <br />for these gravel pits be issued at this time. The above information is pro- <br />vided, however, for your assistance and convenience, and in an effort to co- <br />operate with you in every way. <br />Sincerely, <br />L. William Miller <br />County Attorney <br />LWM/tc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.