Laserfiche WebLink
aquifers are monitored at one site in each of these drainages while the Flume Gulch alluvium is <br />monitored at hvo locations. The 1993 hydrologic monitoring report, Hydro-Engineering (1994), <br />presents the discussion of the monitoring results through 1993. The table on the blue pull-out index <br />provides basic well data for all wells monitored in 1994. <br />Spoil springs with flows greater than 5 epm are required to be monitored to further define <br />the ground-water quality. The flows from all spoil springs were less than 5 gpm during 1994. <br />Table 1-I (page 1-3) presents the pit and well dewatering data and volume of water used <br />for dust depression for Trapper Mine for 1994. This data shows that, on an average, approximately 13 <br />and 8.5 gpm were pumped from the Trapper Mine pits and dewatering wells, respectively. This data <br />is useful in interpreting water-level changes and consumptive use. <br />Surface-water flow and quality have been monitored at the Flume (S-1), West Buzzard, <br />Johnson, No Name, Coyote, and east and west Pyeatt drainages, during 1994. Discharge through the <br />Coyote drainage vas from seep only, as no discharge occurred through Coyote Dam in 1994. The <br />Johnson, No Name, East Buzzard, Coyote, West Buzzard, Ute, Middle Pyeatt, Ell:, East Pyeatt, Deer, <br />West Pyeatt, Far East Buzzard, Grouse and Sage drainages are Trappers NPDES discharge sites 001, <br />002, 003, 005, 006, 008, 009, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014, 015 and 016, respectively. <br /> <br />1-2 <br />