HYDRO26788

• Permit No: C1980001
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 12/19/2002
• Doc Name: Memo re 8/02 and 9/02 NPDES discharge exceedances
• From: Tom Kaldenbach
• To: File
• Permit Index Doc Type: DMR’s
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Kaldenbach, Tom
From: CARLA J Lenkey [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:33 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Permit CO-0032638, Edna Mine
Tom,
I need to revise my last statement to you. I will not be sending P & M
a violation letter for Mg since the permit is being amended and the
parameter is going away. The amendment will occurr in 2003. Thanks
Carla
»> "Kaldenbach, Tom" <[e-mail]> 11127/02 10:53AM
»>
Carla,
When the letter regarding the manganese exceedance goes out, would you
please cc it to me.
Also, do you know if there are manganese and sulfate standards still
in
effect on the stream segment where the Edna Mine is located [Segment
13c
(Trout Creek above Fish Creek) in CWOCC's Region 12 of the Yampa River
basin] ?
I know that the mine operator, Pittsburgh and Midway Coal,
successfully
petitioned the CWOCC in early 2002 to have those standards removed.
Thanks again,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: CARLA J Lenkey [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:57 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Permit CO-0032638, Edna Mine
At this time, the agency is not taking an enforcement action against
the Edna mine for their W ET testing failures. They have performed the
necessary accelerated testing and the issue is considered closed.
They
will receive a letter for the Mg violation next month. If I can be of
further assistance or if you have further information regarding this
facility I would be happy to discuss this further with you. thank you
Carla
»> "Kaldenbach, Tom" <[e-mail]> 11/26/02 03:38PM
»>
Hi Carla,
Please let me know your agencys plans for any enforcement actions for
the
3rd quarter W ET test failure and August manganese exceedance at the
Edna