My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61143
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/2/2007
Doc Name
Joinder of SDMD in Notice of Appeal
From
Colorado Court of Appeals
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
withdrawn as parties. Gilpin County announced through its representative that it was <br />withdrawing as a party because it had reached a stipulated agreement with the Applicant <br />conceming utuesolved issues. Thai agreement is set forth in a pleading entitled "Joint <br />Stipulation of Applicant and County of Gilpin Concerning County Permitting <br />Requirements." The contents of the Joint Stipulation were not incorporated into the <br />Board's order. Prior to the Formal Board Hearing, the parties met to attempt to resolve <br />other issues identsfied in the Board's preheating conference order. As a result of that <br />informal meeting, the Division draftod conditions or stipulations concerning groundwater <br />monitoring, groundwater impacts and blasting. Because all parties did not agree to she <br />proposed conditions, the conditions were not adopted by the Board at the time it <br />considered the draft preheating conference order. The conditions are set forth in greater <br />detail below. <br />The issues set Forth in the preheating order, as revised, are: <br />{A) Has the Applicant provided Pre-Mining & Mining Plan Maps that accurately <br />show the location of the quarry entrance and all permanent man-made structures <br />within 200 feet of the quarry entrance {affected land)? (Rule 6.43 (b) -Exhibit <br />C.) <br />(13) Has the Applicant provided an appropriate blast vibration analysis and blasting <br />plan demonstrating that off-site azeas will not be adversely affected by blasting? <br />At issue are potential damages to: the Black Hawk/Central City Sanitation <br />District's Waste Water Treatment Plant, sewage lines to the Clear Creek <br />Convenience Store (owned by Clear Creek Convenience LLC), 5ih•cr Dollar <br />MMRR Board Older, M-2004-067 <br />2673 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.