My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61143
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/2/2007
Doc Name
Joinder of SDMD in Notice of Appeal
From
Colorado Court of Appeals
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF <br />DENVER, COLORADO <br />Court Address:1437 Bannock Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br /> COURT USE ONLY <br /> ,~ <br />CITY OF BLACK HAWK, COLORADO, A <br />COLORADO HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY, et al., Case Number: 06 CV 2234 <br />Plaintiffs, <br /> Ctrm: 22 <br />Vs. <br />STATE OF COLORADO MINED LANED <br />RECLAMATION BOARD, et al <br />Defendants, . ~~;• ~ ;: <br />Vs. <br />-. <br />BLACK HAWK-CENTRAL CITY'SANI~ATION <br />DEPARTMENT. ... __._ ..._._.-....~_.--------._--.. <br />Defendant/CrossClaimant ""'~' <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO MINED LAND. <br />RECLAMATION BOARD, <br />Cross Claim Defendants. <br /> <br />ORDER <br />THE Mined Land Reclamation Board's issuance of a reclamation permit in file <br />M-2004-62 issued February 1, 2000 is AFFIRNI~D. <br />'The decision of the Board is challenged by various parties for various reasons. <br />Several issues are raised regarding `whether the application identified the previously <br />obtained permits from local governmental entities and from the Army Corps of <br />Engineers. Rule 6.4.13 only requires a statement that prior to operation, the applicant <br />will obtain all.necessary payments. Additionally, the requirements prohibit operation if <br />there is no scenario in which it can be conducted legally. <br />Several instances are alleged that the Board erred factually (the harm of vibration <br />levels, the adequacy ofthe re-vegetation plan, setting the bond level for re-vegetation, the <br />impact on waters of the U.S.) <br /> <br />.-,_y <br />C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.