My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61041
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:00:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006018
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/19/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Gustavson Associates
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. As shown on our reclamation bond calculation in EXHIBIT L, we have assumed a <br />maximum disturbance of 50 acres. As presented in EXHIBIT D, Cell A will be divided roughly <br />into 2 phases, which we believe will keep the disturbance around 35 acres, but for conservative <br />reasons, we have calculated a bond amount based on 50 acres. Once sufficient area has been <br />developed in Cell A so as not to interfere with mining, any future stripping will be immediately <br />placed back into the mined portions of Cell A. As the overburden is placed into the mined out <br />areas of a given cell, it will be graded with a dozer to the reclaim slope angles and reseeded as <br />soon as possible. This will allow all of the upland areas (area above the final water level of the <br />lakes) to begin to be revegetated almost immediately after mining is completed. This will both <br />minimize the need for large stockpiles of overburden and re-handle of material. As mining of <br />Cell A is being completed, Cell B will be stripped. This initial overburden from Cell B will be <br />placed into Cell A as the final reclamation. <br />A conservative estimate of the maximum acreage that might have to be dewatered should <br />Lafarge not complete mining would be all of Cell A. This would amount to 47 acres. <br />EXHIBIT E -RECLAMATION PLAN <br />The owner has agreed to change the post-mining land use to rangeland. <br />8. Lafarge is not opposed to using the excess overburden for development of coves, shelves, <br />shallow areas, etc. Lafarge will work with the property owner to incorporate these comments <br />into the reclamation plan in a manner that will be beneficial to both the owner and wildlife. <br />9. Since the site will generate excess overburden material, Lafarge has no objection to <br />increasing the depth of replacement overburden to 24 inches. <br />]0. Lafarge has no objections to amending the seed mixture to the one your provided, <br />assuming that the Book Cliff Soil Conservation District has no objections. <br />6.4.6 EXHIBIT F -Reclamation Plan Map <br />11. Lafarge has no objections to revising the map to show these areas. In general, they occur <br />along the waters edge and are defined as being twelve inches below to six inches above. <br />6.4.7 EXHIBIT G -Water Information <br />12. Lafarge is currently in the process Attached to the back of this response is a letter <br />specifically addressing the water well issues. Lafarge would be pleased to: <br />a) provide copies of these permits to the DMG when they are issued, <br />b) if required, complete a TR should any significant changes be requested by the <br />approving agencies, and <br />5757 Central Avenue ~ Phone 303-443-2209 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80301 GUS7wy50N ASSOCIATES Fax: 303-443-3156 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.